PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 9, 2021American Journal of Perinatology7 citationsOpen Access

Determinant of Prenatal Diagnostic Testing among Women with Increased Risk of Fetal Aneuploidy and Genetic Disorders

TMTamandra MorganCTCatherine D. TanMDMicaela Della-Torre

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess factors that influence patients' decisions in accepting prenatal diagnostic testing following genetic counseling for increased risk of fetal aneuploidy. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of women at increased risk of fetal aneuploidy and genetic disorders who had genetic counseling from January 2012 to December 2016 at a single academic center. Demographics, indications for genetic counseling, and rates of diagnostic testing were collected and compared between those who accepted diagnostic testing and those who chose cell free DNA. The variables were analyzed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and multiple logistic regression. Result Of the 2,373 pregnant women who underwent genetic counseling for increased risk of fetal aneuploidy and genetic disorders during the study period, 321 women had diagnostic testing (13.5%). Women at 35 years and older accepted diagnostic testing more than women younger than 35 years (20.7 vs. 11.5%, p < 0.001). Asian women accepted diagnostic testing at 27.7% more than white, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic women at 18.0, 12.1, and 11.7%, respectively, p = 0.002. Number of indications for genetic counseling influenced the likelihood of accepting diagnostic testing. Women with one indication had 11.5% acceptance of diagnostic testing, and with two and three indications, it was 17.0 and 29.2%, respectively. The commonest indication for diagnostic testing was cystic hygroma (risk ratio RR = 7.5, 95% confidence interval CI: 3.12–8.76 p < 0.001). The relative risk of diagnostic testing for fetuses with shortened long bones, femur and humerus, thickened nuchal fold, echogenic bowel, single umbilical artery, and increased nuchal translucency were 4.0, 3.3, 3.1, 2.7, and 2.7, respectively. Abnormal serum analyte alone was associated with less acceptance of diagnostic testing (RR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7–0.96, p = 0.017). Conclusion Age, race, ethnicity, and cumulative number of indications for genetic counseling influenced acceptance of diagnostic testing in at-risk women of fetal aneuploidy and genetic disorders. Key Points

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morgan et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8549253cde6ee03eb2ec61https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1692-0309
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: 20092012 · 199 citations
  2. 2Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: the time for first‐trimester nuchal translucency has come.2001 · 40 citations
  3. 3Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age2014 · 23 citations
  4. 4Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy.2001 · 287 citations
  5. 5ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities2007 · 581 citations