PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1991AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology12 citations

Afferent vascular resistance control during hemorrhage in normal and autonomically blocked rabbits

View Full Paper
CCC. A. CourneyaPKPaul KörnerJOJ. R. Oliver

Structured PICO

P
Population
Conscious rabbits (normal, autonomically blocked, and neurohumorally blocked)
I
Intervention
Hemorrhage (bled at approximately 3% blood volume/min to 80% BV)
C
Comparator
Normal effector function vs autonomic blockade; different baroreceptor states (both working, one working, neither working)
O
Outcome
Hindquarter conductance and heart rate responsessurrogate

Neurally mediated regulation during hemorrhage provides better blood pressure maintenance than regulation mediated primarily through pressor hormones.

Abstract

We examined the role of the arterial and cardiac baroreceptors on the hindquarter conductance and heart rate responses of conscious rabbits bled at approximately 3% blood volume (BV)/min to 80% BV (i.e., 20% BV removed). We used rabbits with both sets of baroreceptors working and when only one or neither sets was working. Each animal was studied with normal effector function and during autonomic blockade (hormonal + local effectors), where release of arginine vasopressin (AVP) and renin (angiotensin II, ANG II) were enhanced. The local response (LR) to hemorrhage was determined in a separate group of neurohumorally blocked rabbits. The estimated constrictor response (ECR) was the difference between the LR and net conductance response. In normal rabbits, the ECR was 49 units, with the estimated arterial-to-cardiac barorecptor drive ratio approximately 2.8:1 and with the two receptor groups acting by simple addition. Both barorecptors contributed to the rise in heart rate, with the relative arterial-to-cardiac baroreceptor drive ratio approximately 4:1. When hemorrhage was performed during autonomic blockade, ECR was 84 units (compared with normal rabbits, P less than 0.01), but blood pressure was poorly maintained and the constrictor effect was not under baroreceptor control. Although the baroreceptors were critical for AVP release during autonomic blockade, they played no role in renin release (ANG II production); the latter was released in large amounts, producing near-maximum constriction, which was unrelated to the afferent input. Thus neurally mediated regulation during hemorrhage has substantial advantages over that mediated primarily through the pressor hormones.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Courneya et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a855f40f0d179eaafb5573chttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1991.261.2.h380
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AFFERENT CONTROL OF VASOPRESSIN AND RENIN RELEASE DURING HAEMORRHAGE IN NORMAL AND AUTONOMICALLY BLOCKED RABBITS1992 · 5 citations
  2. 2Autonomic, hormonal, and local circulatory effects of hemorrhage in conscious rabbits1990 · 38 citations
  3. 3Cardiac and arterial baroreceptor influences in release of vasopressin and renin during hemorrhage1987 · 69 citations
  4. 4Reflex release of vasopressin and renin in hemorrhage is enhanced by autonomic blockade1990 · 45 citations
  5. 5The role of cardiac receptor and arterial baroreceptor reflexes in control of the circulation during acute change of blood volume in the conscious rabbit.1984 · 68 citations