PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

W and Z Masses in Pion Units: Withdrawal of a Statistical Claim, and the One-Loop Question That Remains

View Full Paper
MSMatthew Schulz

Key Points

  • To re-evaluate the statistical significance of expressing W and Z boson masses as integer ratios of the neutral pion mass when estimating the weak mixing angle.
  • Calculated the on-shell weak mixing angle sin²θ_W = 1 − (m_W/m_Z)² using integer approximations (595/675) derived from neutral pion mass units (mπ⁰ = 134.9768 ± 0.0005 MeV).
  • Quantified deviation (σ) from measured values across exact mass ratios, rounded integer values, and non-nearest integer selections.
  • The integer choice n_Z = 675 is post-hoc rather than the nearest integer 676, where n_Z = 676 gives sin²θ_W = 0.22529 (7.96σ from measurement) compared to 0.30σ for n_Z = 675.
  • The exact tree-level value (sin²θ_W = 0.22320) deviates by 1.01σ from the measured on-shell value (0.22290 ± 0.00030), showing that integer rounding outperforms exact calculation solely because rounding error mimics omitted radiative corrections.
  • Whether standard one-loop electroweak corrections applied to the integer-derived input 0.22299 converge to the MS-bar value of 0.23122 ± 0.00003 remains an open, uncalculated question.

Abstract

The W and Z boson masses, expressed in units of the neutral pion mass (mπ⁰ = 134. 9768 ± 0. 0005 MeV, PDG 2025), are 595. 430 and 675. 580. Replacing these by the integers 595 and 675 gives sin²θW = 1 − (595/675) ² = 0. 22299, against a measured on-shell value of 0. 22290 ± 0. 00030. v1 of this record presented that agreement as statistically significant. This version withdraws that presentation for the reasons given in the correction notice above, and states three facts v1 did not. First, the pion does not appear in the result. In the on-shell scheme sin²θW is *defined* as 1 − (mW/mZ) ², so the base mass cancels identically; the content of the claim is that mW/mZ ≈ 119/135, and mπ enters only as the quantity that made the integers visible. Second, the integer 675 is not the nearest integer to 675. 580 — 676 is. v1 acknowledged this selection in a footnote and called it mildly post-hoc. It is promoted here because it is load-bearing: nZ = 676 gives sin²θW = 0. 22529, which is 7. 96σ from measurement, while nZ = 675 gives 0. 30σ. Third, the rounding improves the agreement. The exact tree-level value from PDG masses is 1 − (mW/mZ) ² = 0. 22320, which sits 1. 01σ from the measured on-shell value. The rounded integers give 0. 30σ. **The approximation outperforms the exact calculation**, because the rounding error happens to point in the same direction as the radiative correction that a tree-level expression omits. The ρ (770), with integers 104/118, returns 0. 22321 — essentially the exact tree-level value — and is scored *worse* by v1's criterion for that reason. What remains is a well-posed open calculation, stated in v1 §5 and preserved here: whether standard one-loop electroweak corrections applied to 0. 22299 as a tree-level input converge to the MS-bar value 0. 23122 ± 0. 00003. That calculation is routine for a precision electroweak theorist, has not been performed, and would settle the question either way. **Keywords: ** weak mixing angle · W boson · Z boson · pion mass · look-elsewhere effect · null distribution · post-hoc selection · correction · negative result

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matthew Schulz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85630603308d306e2d602fhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21966977
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper