PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2026Transforming Government People Process and Policy0 citations

Power structures, elite networks, and informal governance in governance systems

View Full Paper
RARaed Atef

Key Points

  • To critically examine how power structures, elite networks, and personal linkages interact with formal institutions to influence governance performance, accountability, and transparency.
  • Conducted a structured critical literature review using a narrative synthesis framework on Scopus-indexed peer-reviewed literature published from 2020 to 2025.
  • Screened, thematically coded, and comparatively analyzed 35 selected studies addressing power structures, elite influence, patronage systems, and informal networks.
  • Identified four primary interaction mechanisms through which formal institutions and informal power structures operate: complementarity, substitution, competition, and overlap.
  • Demonstrated that elite networks and patronage systems consistently modify, bypass, or dictate the implementation of formal rules, resulting in institutional accountability deficits, unequal resource distribution, and diminished institutional legitimacy.

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to critically examine how power structures and personal linkages influence governance systems, with a particular focus on elite dominance and informal networks in shaping institutional performance, accountability and transparency. It moves beyond formal institutional explanations by integrating informal governance dynamics into an integrative analytical framework that explains how governance operates in practice. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a structured critical literature review using a narrative synthesis approach. Data were collected from peer-reviewed sources indexed in Scopus, covering publications from 2020 to 2025. A systematic screening process guided the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by thematic coding, comparative analysis and critical interpretation of 35 selected studies focusing on power structures, elite influence, patronage systems, informal networks and governance accountability. Findings The review demonstrates that governance outcomes are produced through the interaction of formal institutions and informal power structures. These interactions operate through four key mechanisms: complementarity, substitution, competition and overlap. While formal institutions emphasize transparency and rule-based governance, informal mechanisms such as elite networks and patronage systems shape how rules are implemented, modified or bypassed. These interaction patterns contribute to variation in governance performance, including accountability deficits, unequal resource distribution and reduced institutional legitimacy across contexts. Originality/value This study provides a structured integrative synthesis of formal and informal governance literature and develops an analytical typology of interaction mechanisms that explains how relational power structures systematically shape governance outcomes across diverse contexts, thereby offering a refined conceptual contribution to understanding governance complexity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raed Atef (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85637603308d306e2d6947https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-05-2026-0263
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper