PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 30, 2018Journal of Hypertension25 citations

Risk of new-onset metabolic syndrome associated with white-coat and masked hypertension

View Full Paper
CCCesare CuspidiRFRita FacchettiMBMichele Bombelli

Key Result

White-coat (OR 1.75), masked (OR 2.58), and sustained hypertension (OR 2.14) by ambulatory criteria were all associated with an increased risk of incident metabolic syndrome over 10 years.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,182)

Structured PICO

Do white-coat, masked, and sustained hypertension increase the risk of new-onset metabolic syndrome compared to normal blood pressure in participants without baseline metabolic syndrome?

P
Population
1,182 participants without metabolic syndrome at baseline, followed for 10 years to assess the risk of new-onset metabolic syndrome based on blood pressure phenotypes.
E
Exposure
White-coat hypertension (WCH), masked hypertension, and sustained hypertension (defined by office, 24-h ambulatory, and home blood pressure values)
C
Comparator
Participants with in-office and out-of-office normal blood pressure
O
Outcome
New-onset metabolic syndrome (MetS) after a 10-year follow-upsurrogate

Isolated or combined blood pressure elevations identified by office and ambulatory measurements carry an increased risk of developing new-onset metabolic syndrome over 10 years.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 1.75 (95% CI 1.01–3.04)

p-value: p=0.0046

Abstract

AIM: In the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study, clinical and metabolic variables as well as office, home and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) values were simultaneously measured at baseline and after a 10-year follow-up. The study design allowed us to assess the value of selective and combined elevation of different BP phenotypes in predicting new-onset metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: The present analysis included 1182 participants without MetS at baseline, as defined by the APT III criteria. On the basis of office, 24-h ambulatory BP and home values, participants were divided into four groups: normal, white-coat hypertension (WCH), masked hypertension and sustained hypertension. RESULTS: Compared with participants with in-office and out-of-office normal BP, a greater incidence of new-onset age-adjusted and sex-adjusted MetS was observed in WCH (OR = 1.75, CI 1.01-3.04, P = 0.0046), masked hypertension (OR = 2.58, CI 1.26-5.30; P = 0.009) and sustained hypertension (OR = 2.14, CI 1.20-3.79, P = 0.009)) when out-of-office BP was defined by ambulatory criteria. This was not the case when out-of-office BP was defined by home criteria, as only the WCH group showed a greater risk (OR 2.16, CI 1.28-3.63, P = 0.003). Similar findings were obtained for single components of the MetS such as abdominal obesity and hyperglycemia. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that either isolated or combined BP elevations identified by office/ambulatory measurements, carry an increased risk of new-onset MetS, whereas, only WCH is associated with a greater risk of incident MetS whenever BP phenotypes are identified by office/home measurements. In a clinical perspective, a comprehensive evaluation of BP status based on office/ambulatory measurements may improve diagnosis of new-onset MetS and activate measures for its prevention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cuspidi et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Hypertension and Metabolic Syndrome (n=1,182). White-coat, masked, and sustained hypertension vs. Normal in-office and out-of-office blood pressure was evaluated on New-onset metabolic syndrome (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.01-3.04, p=0.0046). White-coat (OR 1.75), masked (OR 2.58), and sustained hypertension (OR 2.14) by ambulatory criteria were all associated with an increased risk of incident metabolic syndrome over 10 years.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85a16aa46f793aa75e34fehttps://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000001767
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper