PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1994Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis A Journal of Vascular Biology17 citationsOpen Access

Overexpression of human lipoprotein lipase enhances uptake of lipoproteins containing apolipoprotein B-100 in transfected cells.

View Full Paper
HSHitoshi ShimanoTGTakanari GotodaKHKenji Harada

Structured PICO

Does overexpression of human lipoprotein lipase enhance the uptake of lipoproteins containing apolipoprotein B-100 in transfected cells?

P
Population
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with human LPL cDNA or antisense LPL cDNA
I
Intervention
Overexpression of human lipoprotein lipase (CHO-LPL)
C
Comparator
Minimal expression of lipoprotein lipase (CHO-anti-LPL)
O
Outcome
Cellular uptake, degradation, and binding of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)surrogate

Overexpression of human lipoprotein lipase in CHO cells enhances the cellular binding and uptake of VLDL, suggesting cell surface LPL plays a key role in lipoprotein metabolism.

Abstract

To investigate the role in lipoprotein metabolism of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) secreted by tissues, we established two cell lines. Fusion plasmids containing either human LPL cDNA or antisense LPL cDNA under control of the cytomegalovirus promoter were transfected into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, designated as CHO-LPL and CHO-anti-LPL, respectively. CHO-LPL constitutively produced a high level of LPL, whereas CHO-anti-LPL produced a minimal level. When very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) was incubated with CHO-LPL, VLDL triglycerides were hydrolyzed, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) was produced, and apolipoprotein E contents increased. CHO-LPL took up and degraded 125I-VLDL at 37 degrees C four times more strongly than did CHO-anti-LPL. Whereas the degradation of apolipoprotein E-deficient VLDL was only 12% that of normal VLDL in CHO-LPL, structural changes of the lipoprotein, including apolipoprotein E expression on the lipoprotein surface, may be important for the cellular uptake of VLDL. Furthermore, we found that binding at 4 degrees C of VLDL and LDL to CHO-LPL was greater than to CHO-anti-LPL, and this binding difference was abolished by washing the cells with heparin. This suggests that cell surface LPL plays a role in the binding of lipoproteins to the cells. We conclude that both the composition of VLDL particles and their cellular binding are influenced by LPL secreted by cells, both of which may enhance the cellular uptake of VLDL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shimano et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85a3174f2eb4dbc91e6698https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.14.2.235
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancement of the Binding of Triglyceride-rich Lipoproteins to the Very Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor by Apolipoprotein E and Lipoprotein Lipase1995 · 226 citations
  2. 2Lipoprotein Lipase Binds to Low Density Lipoprotein Receptors and Induces Receptor-mediated Catabolism of Very Low Density Lipoproteins1996 · 89 citations
  3. 3Overexpression of human lipoprotein lipase in transgenic mice. Resistance to diet-induced hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia.1993 · 125 citations
  4. 4Lipoprotein lipase-mediated uptake and degradation of low density lipoproteins by fibroblasts and macrophages.1992 · 193 citations
  5. 5Adenovirus-Mediated Gene Transfer of Human Lipoprotein Lipase Ameliorates the Hyperlipidemias Associated with Apolipoprotein E and LDL Receptor Deficiencies in Mice1997 · 49 citations