PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 28, 2014British Journal for the History of Philosophy24 citations

Nietzsche's Naturalized Aestheticism

View Full Paper
MMMatthew Meyer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This essay seeks to overcome the divide that has emerged in recent scholarship between Alexander Nehamas’s reading of Nietzsche as an aestheticist who eschews the dogmatism implicit in the scientific project and Brian Leiter's reading of Nietzsche as a hard-nosed naturalist whose project is continuous with the natural sciences. It is argued that Nietzsche turns to the natural sciences to justify a relationalist ontology that not only eliminates metaphysical concepts such as ‘being’ and ‘things-in-themselves’, but also can be linked to key components of the aestheticist reading. As a result, Nietzsche's naturalism should not be understood as opposing important features of his aestheticism. Instead, Nietzsche's project should be understood in terms of a naturalized aestheticism that rejects the metaphysical-moral interpretation of existence espoused by philosophers such as Plato, Kant, and Schopenhauer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matthew Meyer (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85ac5c68d2ad262cd59c0bhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2014.981743
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper