Does combined antiplatelet therapy reduce monocyte-platelet interaction and monocyte activation compared to standard anticoagulation in patients after coronary stenting?
Combined antiplatelet therapy, but not anticoagulation, reduces monocyte-platelet interaction and monocyte activation after coronary stenting, which may contribute to a decreased risk for thrombotic events.
BACKGROUND: Monocyte activation induces different procoagulant and proadhesive inflammatory responses and thus may play a role in thrombotic complications after coronary interventions. Monocyte-platelet interaction may trigger these effects inducing monocyte activation. AIMS: To characterize the effect of antiplatelet vs anticoagulation therapy on monocyte-platelet interaction and monocyte function after intracoronary stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Immediately before, and during the first 12 days after successful coronary stenting, monocyte-platelet conjugates and monocyte function were assessed by flow cytometric detection of GPIIb/IIIa (CD41) on monocytes and by monocyte surface exposure of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) and L-selectin (CD62L). Twenty patients receiving combined antiplatelet therapy (ticlopidine, aspirin) were compared to 20 patients with standard anticoagulation (phenprocoumon, overlapping heparin, aspirin). Before stenting, monocyte-platelet conjugates and Mac-1 surface expression in both groups were significantly increased, while L-selectin was significantly diminished. Anticoagulation did not change these variables significantly during the subsequent 12 days. In contrast, antiplatelet therapy reduced platelet-monocyte conjugates by 46 +/- 9.3% (mean +/- SEM, P = 0.0019) within 4 days, which was associated with a decrease in Mac-1 expression (28 +/- 6.7%, P = 0.0013) and an increase in L-selectin (56 +/- 15.0%, P = 0.0061). CONCLUSION: After intracoronary stenting, combined antiplatelet therapy, but not anticoagulation, causes reduction of monocyte-platelet interaction, which is associated with monocyte deactivation. This may contribute to a decreased risk for thrombotic events.
May et al. (1997) studied this question.