PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2000Bioethics135 citations

International Research Ethics

View Full Paper
USUdo SchücklenkRARichard Ashcroft

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article provides a critical overview of the most important issues pertaining to the ongoing debate on international research ethics. It critically describes three problems of continuing concern: 1) the question of whether the distinction between therapeutic and non-therapeutic research should be upheld; 2) the questions of whether currently demanded best proven diagnostic and therapeutic methods of treatment for all research subjects is feasible both in developed and in developing countries, and whether it should be upheld; 3) the questions of who owns international research ethics guidelines and regulatory frameworks and, how decisions about changes to such international guidelines can possibly be achieved, given that it seems to be the case that genuine disagreement about issues of content is possible and likely.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schücklenk et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a869afea94eefd7bf51312dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00187
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper