PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2016Cardiology27 citations

Practical Considerations for the Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants

View Full Paper
RTRahul TrikhaPKPeter R. Kowey

Key Result

Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are as effective as warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and reduce intracranial bleeding, but require careful clinical use.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), including subgroups with renal impairment, mechanical heart valves, myocardial infarction, previous stroke, and valvular heart disease.
I
Intervention
Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban)
C
Comparator
Warfarin (in the context of discussed phase-3 trials)
O
Outcome
Prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, and incidence of intracranial bleeding

This review provides practical guidance on the use, dosing, and reversal of NOACs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, including those with complex cardiovascular comorbidities.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) approved for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Phase-3 clinical trials demonstrated NOACs were as effective as warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and associated with decreased incidences of intracranial bleeding. Additionally, NOACs provide quicker onset of action, simpler dosing, more predictable pharmacokinetic profiles, and decreased food and drug interactions compared with warfarin. Despite the advantages of NOACs, the lack of knowledge may limit their use in clinical practice. METHODS: A search was performed on the terms 'atrial fibrillation' and 'dabigatran', 'apixaban', 'edoxaban', or 'rivaroxaban' to identify relevant papers; large randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and treatment guideline recommendations were given preference. Searches to identify registries, treatment guidelines, and meta-analyses relevant to patient subgroups were also employed. RESULTS: Dosing recommendations, initiation of treatment, and applications in patients who undergo NVAF procedures, have mechanical heart valves, or experience other cardiovascular conditions such as myocardial infarction, previous stroke, and valvular heart disease are summarized. The NOAC-specific reversal approaches are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Several important factors should be considered regarding the adequate use of NOACs, especially in patients with renal impairment or cardiovascular conditions other than NVAF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trikha et al. (2016) conducted a review in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. warfarin was evaluated. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are as effective as warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and reduce intracranial bleeding, but require careful clinical use.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a86e2e6972878eab4beeddahttps://doi.org/10.1159/000447530
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper