PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2023European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology19 citationsOpen Access

Factors influencing successful reconstruction of tympanic membrane perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

KIKata IllésDGDorottya GergőZKZsuzsanna Keresztély

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, our study aimed to provide information about the factors that influence the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction. METHODS: Our systematic search was conducted on November 24, 2021, using the CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. Observational studies with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up on type I tympanoplasty or myringoplasty were included, while non-English articles, patients with cholesteatoma or specific inflammatory diseases, and ossiculoplasty cases were excluded. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021289240) and PRISMA reporting guideline was used. Risk of bias was evaluated with the QUIPS tool. A random effect model was used in the analyses. Primary outcome was the rate of closed tympanic cavities. RESULTS: After duplicate removal, 9454 articles were found, of which 39 cohort studies were included. Results of four analyses showed significant effects: age (OR: 0.62, CI 0.50; 0.78, p value: 0.0002), size of the perforation (OR: 0.52, CI 0.29; 0.94, p value: 0.033), opposite ear condition (OR: 0.32, CI 0.12; 0.85, p value: 0.028), and the surgeon's experience (OR: 0.42, CI 0.26; 0.67, p value: 0.005), while prior adenoid surgery, smoking, the site of the perforation, and discharge of the ear did not. Four factors: etiology, Eustachian tube function, concomitant allergic rhinitis, and duration of the ear discharge were analyzed qualitatively. CONCLUSIONS: The age of the patient, the size of the perforation, the opposite ear status, and the surgeon's experience have a significant effect on the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction. Further comprehensive studies are needed to analyze the interactions between the factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Illés et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a86fd5ec27ad527967ccfc9https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07831-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Does Smoking Influence the Surgical Outcome of a Myringoplasty?2013 · 5 citations
  2. 2Clinical Analysis of Paper Patch Myringoplasty in Patients with Tympanic Membrane Perforations2016 · 7 citations
  3. 3Doing Meta-Analysis with R2021 · 1,855 citations
  4. 4Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases.1993 · 138 citations
  5. 5Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2019 · 7,176 citations