PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2023American Journal of Clinical Oncology13 citationsOpen Access

Management Strategies and Outcomes in Primary Liver Angiosarcoma

NRNeeraj RamakrishnanRMRyan MokhtariGCGregory W. Charville

Key Result

Primary liver angiosarcoma was associated with poor outcomes, demonstrating a median overall survival of 6 months and a 2- and 5-year overall survival of 38.6%.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=23)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

P
Population
23 patients with primary liver angiosarcoma treated at a single academic center between 2000 and 2022, with most aged 70 to 79 at diagnosis.
E
Exposure
Various treatments including systemic chemotherapy (71%), immunotherapy (29%), and local treatment with surgery or radioembolization (14%).
O
Outcome
Overall survival (OS)hard clinical

Primary liver angiosarcoma has a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of 6 months, highlighting the need for more effective systemic therapies.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Primary hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare tumor of the liver that originates from endothelial and fibroblastic tissue, with poor prognosis and lack of standardized treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 23 patients with primary liver angiosarcoma treated at an academic sarcoma center. METHODS: We screened all patients with primary liver angiosarcoma treated at Stanford between 2000 and 2022. Data was collected from EPIC electronic medical records and included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and patient outcomes. Statistical analysis was completed using Python 3.0, while survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Lifelines Packages. RESULTS: There were nearly equal numbers of males (11) and females (12) in our study, with most patients aged 70 to 79 at diagnosis. The median overall survival (OS) was 6 months (range 0.07 to 222.6 mo). The 2- and 5-year OS were both 38.6%. 71% of patients received systemic treatment with chemotherapy, while 29% received immunotherapy. Local treatment with surgery or radioembolization was performed in 14% of patients. Three patients in our study displayed particularly improved OS and received various treatments, which ranged from hepatic resection to ipilimumab/nivolumab. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that primary liver angiosarcoma has poor outcomes despite treatment. Surgical resection with negative margins is the only curative modality. However, most patients present with advanced disease and are not surgical candidates. Further research is needed to identify more effective systemic therapy options for this devastating disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramakrishnan et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Primary liver angiosarcoma (n=23). Treatment modalities (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, surgery, radioembolization) was evaluated on Overall survival. Primary liver angiosarcoma was associated with poor outcomes, demonstrating a median overall survival of 6 months and a 2- and 5-year overall survival of 38.6%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a87151dd75f6552a082bb4ahttps://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000001032
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper