PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1993Journal of General Virology20 citations

Rhinoviral receptor discrimination: mutational changes in the canyon regions of human rhinovirus types 2 and 14 indicate a different site of interaction

View Full Paper
MDMarkus DuechlerSKSigrid KetterTSTim Skern

Structured PICO

P
Population
HeLa cells transfected with RNAs transcribed from mutated cDNAs of human rhinovirus type 2 (HRV2)
I
Intervention
Amino acid substitutions in the capsid proteins (mutations in canyon regions)
C
Comparator
Wild-type HRV2
O
Outcome
Viability, growth characteristics, and affinity for the minor group receptorsurrogate

Mutational changes in the canyon regions of HRV2 do not alter receptor affinity, suggesting contact sites for minor group viruses differ from major group viruses like HRV14.

Abstract

Amino acid sequence comparisons between the capsid proteins of several human rhinovirus (HRV) serotypes identified residues potentially involved in the discrimination between the major and the minor group receptors. Amino acids conserved within minor group HRVs were substituted in a full-length cDNA clone of HRV2 for those found at equivalent positions in major group HRVs. Transfection of HeLa cells with RNAs transcribed from seven individual mutated cDNAs gave rise to only two viable viruses; growth characteristics and affinity for the minor group receptor of both were unchanged compared to wild-type. Similar mutations in HRV14 were previously shown to alter the affinity for its receptor; the contact sites between the minor group viruses and the respective receptor may therefore be different.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duechler et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a87ce3002f504243ce96371https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-74-10-2287
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper