PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2017PLoS ONE161 citationsOpen Access

A protocol for identifying suitable biomarkers to assess fish health: A systematic review

FKFrederieke J. KroonCSClaire StretenSHSimon Harries

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers have been used extensively to provide the connection between external levels of contaminant exposure, internal levels of tissue contamination, and early adverse effects in organisms. OBJECTIVES: To present a three-step protocol for identifying suitable biomarkers to assess fish health in coastal and marine ecosystems, using Gladstone Harbour (Australia) as a case study. METHODS: Prior to applying our protocol, clear working definitions for biomarkers were developed to ensure consistency with the global literature on fish health assessment. First, contaminants of concern were identified based on the presence of point and diffuse sources of pollution and available monitoring data for the ecosystem of interest. Second, suitable fish species were identified using fisheries dependent and independent data, and prioritised based on potential pathways of exposure to the contaminants of concern. Finally, a systematic and critical literature review was conducted on the use of biomarkers to assess the health of fish exposed to the contaminants of concern. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: We present clear working definitions for bioaccumulation markers, biomarkers of exposure, biomarkers of effect and biomarkers of susceptibility. Based on emission and concentration information, seven metals were identified as contaminants of concern for Gladstone Harbour. Twenty out of 232 fish species were abundant enough to be potentially suitable for biomarker studies; five of these were prioritised based on potential pathways of exposure and susceptibility to metals. The literature search on biomarkers yielded 5,035 articles, of which 151met the inclusion criteria. Based on our review, the most suitable biomarkers include bioaccumulation markers, biomarkers of exposure (CYP1A, EROD, SOD, LPOX, HSP, MT, DNA strand breaks, micronuclei, apoptosis), and biomarkers of effect (histopathology, TAG:ST). CONCLUSION: Our protocol outlines a clear pathway to identify suitable biomarkers to assess fish health in coastal and marine ecosystems, which can be applied to biomarker studies in aquatic ecosystems around the world.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kroon et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a87fcd24231b321a876e853https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174762
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ecological Risk Assessment2008 · 1,117 citations
  2. 2Environmental induction of CYP1A-, CYP2M1- and CYP2K1-like proteins in tropical fish species by produced formation water on the northwest shelf of Australia2006 · 8 citations
  3. 3Bioavailability of heavy metals monitoring water, sediments and fish species from a polluted estuary2008 · 281 citations
  4. 4The physiological performance and immune response of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) to nitrite exposure2016 · 51 citations
  5. 5A multibiomarker approach in juvenile turbot, Scophthalmus maximus, exposed to contaminated sediments2012 · 27 citations