PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 7, 2012European Journal of Heart Failure40 citationsOpen Access

Why and How do Elderly Patients with Heart Failure Die? Insights from the TIME-CHF Study

View Full Paper
PRPeter RickenbacherMPMatthias PfistererTBThilo Burkard

Key Result

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was associated with a higher rate of non-cardiovascular death compared to reduced ejection fraction (33% vs 16%, P<0.05).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=622)

Structured PICO

P
Population
622 patients with heart failure aged 60 years and older, followed for 18 months to assess causes and modes of death.
O
Outcome
Causes and modes of death (COD and MOD), predictors of death, and event rates before death at 18-month follow-uphard clinical

In elderly heart failure patients, those with HFpEF are more likely to die from non-cardiovascular causes, whereas those with HFrEF are more likely to die from cardiac causes, particularly sudden death.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 33% vs 16%

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

AIMS: Specific causes and modes of death (COD and MOD) of patients with heart failure (HF) are not well described, particularly in those with preserved ejection fraction >45% (HFPEF) and at old age. Thus, using the database of the TIME-CHF study, patients with HFPEF were compared with those with reduced ejection fraction ≤45% (HFREF), and patients ≥75 with those 60-74 years of age to identify MOD and COD, predictors of death, and event rates before death as compared with survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: During the 18-month follow-up, 132/622 patients (21%) died, with similar rates in patients with HFPEF and HFREF and a trend to higher rates in patients aged ≥75 years (24% vs. 17%, P = 0.06). COD and MOD (ACME system) were not different in the age groups. COD was more often non-cardiovascular in HFPEF patients than in HFREF patients (33% vs. 16%, P < 0.05) and cardiac MOD were more frequent in HFREF patients (75% vs. 56%, P < 0.05), mainly due to more sudden deaths (25% vs. 7%, P < 0.05). Patients who died experienced a median of four adverse events (interquartile range 1-7) and one (0-1) hospitalization within 60 days prior to death compared with 0.7 (0.4-1.4) and 0.1 (0.0-0.2) during a randomly selected 60 days in survivors (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Despite similar 18-month mortality in patients with HFREF and those with HFPEF, important differences in COD and MOD were found which were not observed between the two age groups. A high rate of adverse events and hospitalizations preceded death. These observations may be relevant for the management of HF patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rickenbacher et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=622). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) vs. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) was evaluated on Non-cardiovascular cause of death (p=<0.05). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was associated with a higher rate of non-cardiovascular death compared to reduced ejection fraction (33% vs 16%, P<0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8845b6d79ae02bd34e01e2https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs113
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper