PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 19, 2010Blood46 citations

Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban Versus Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: STARS J-V trial

View Full Paper
TFTakeshi FujiSFSatoru FujitaSTShintaro Tachibana

Structured PICO

Does oral edoxaban 30 mg once daily reduce the composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT and PE compared to subcutaneous enoxaparin in patients following total hip arthroplasty?

P
Population
610 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Japan, mean age 62.8 years, mean body weight 57.4 kg.
I
Intervention
Oral edoxaban 30 mg once daily (QD) for 11 to 14 days, initiated 6-24 hours after surgery.
C
Comparator
Subcutaneous enoxaparin 2,000 IU (equivalent to 20 mg) twice daily (BID) for 11 to 14 days, initiated 24-36 hours after surgery (Japanese standard of care).
O
Outcome
Composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE).composite

Oral edoxaban 30 mg once daily is superior to enoxaparin for preventing venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty in Japanese patients, without increasing bleeding risk.

Abstract

Abstract Abstract 3320 Introduction: Edoxaban is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events. The aim of this non-inferiority trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Japan. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, enoxaparin-controlled, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized to oral edoxaban 30 mg once daily (QD) or subcutaneous enoxaparin 2,000 IU, equivalent to 20 mg, twice daily (BID) for 11 to 14 days. Edoxaban was initiated 6–24 hours after surgery and enoxaparin was initiated 24–36 hours after surgery which is the Japanese standard of care. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary safety outcome was the incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Results: A total of 610 patients were randomized. There were no clinically relevant differences in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. The mean age was 62.8 years and mean body weight was 57.4 kg (Efficacy analysis set). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6 of 255 (2.4%) patients receiving edoxaban and 17 of 248 (6.9%) patients receiving enoxaparin (relative risk reduction=65.7%; absolute risk difference -4.5%, 95% CI, -8.6% to -0.9%; P<0.001 for non-inferiority; P=0.0157 for superiority). The thromboembolic events were all asymptomatic DVT (Table). No symptomatic DVT or PE was observed in both treatment groups. The incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events was 2.6% (8/303) vs 3.7% (11/301) in the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively (P=0.475). Major bleeding occurred in 0.7% of the edoxaban group and 2.0% of the enoxaparin group. The rates of elevated serum aminotransferase levels of more than 3 times the upper limit of normal was 2.6% with edoxaban versus 10% with enoxaparin. Conclusions: The STARS J-V trial demonstrated that oral edoxaban 30 mg QD has efficacy superior to enoxaparin 2,000 IU BID in the prevention of thromboembolic events following THA and is associated with a similar incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Disclosures: Fuji: Astellas: Consultancy; Showa Ikakogyo: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Fujita:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithkline: Consultancy. Tachibana:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Kawai:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Toyama Chemical: Consultancy. Koretsune:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, National Lead Investigator. Yamashita:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, National Lead Investigator; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Paid instructor; Sanofi-aventis: Paid instructor; Teijin Pharma: Paid instructor. Nakamura:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithkline: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fuji et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a88655c2c11edba2ecf2599https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v116.21.3320.3320
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Edoxaban Versus Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Pooled Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding From STARS E-3 and STARS J-V2011 · 19 citations
  2. 2Efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip arthroplasty: STARS J-V2015 · 98 citations
  3. 3Edoxaban in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Phase IIb Dose-Finding Study.2009 · 15 citations
  4. 4Edoxaban versus enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee or hip arthroplasty: pooled analysis of coagulation biomarkers and primary efficacy and safety endpoints from two phase 3 trials2016 · 13 citations
  5. 5Safety and Efficacy of Edoxaban, an Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor, for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Japan and Taiwan2014 · 56 citations