PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1978Circulation115 citationsOpen Access

Diagnosis of ventricular septal defect by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Sensitivity, specificity and limitations.

View Full Paper
JSJames G. StevensonIKIsamu KawaboriTDTerryl K. Dooley

Key Points

  • To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and technical limitations of pulsed Doppler echocardiography for diagnosing ventricular septal defects in pediatric patients.
  • Evaluated 105 children undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization for suspected congenital heart defects.
  • Performed pulsed Doppler echocardiography to identify ventricular septal defects by mapping turbulent blood flow across the interventricular septum, using catheterization as the reference standard.
  • Pulsed Doppler echocardiography identified ventricular septal defect in 46 of 51 catheterization-proven cases, yielding a diagnostic sensitivity of 90%.
  • One false-positive finding occurred across the cohort, resulting in a diagnostic specificity of 98%.
  • Defect location, pulmonary vascular resistance, and shunt flow direction influenced diagnostic capability, whereas coexisting cardiac defects did not impede detection.

Abstract

The M-mode echocardiographic findings of ventricular septal defect (VSD) are nonspecific. A specific pulsed Doppler echocardiographic (PDE) diagnosis of VSD can be made by following the turbulent VSD jet through the septum. To assess the sensitivity, specificity and limitations of PDE diagnosis of VSD, 105 children undergoing cardiac catheterization were examined by PDE. These children had a variety of cardiac defects, and a PDE diagnosis of VSD was made in 46/51 (90%) who had VSD proven at catheterization. There was one false positive PDE diagnosis of VSD, for a specificity of 98%. Factors influencing the ability to diagnose VSD by PDE include the location of the defect, level of pulmonary vascular resistance and direction of blood flow through the VSD. The presence of additional defects did not interfere with PDE diagnosis of VSD. The PDE detection of additional defects may identify situations where M-mode echocardiographic estimation of dimensions may not be indicative of the size of VSD shunt.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stevenson et al. (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a887ba88e586ad1c8a55ec3https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.58.2.322
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper