PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2026Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics0 citationsOpen Access

Factors of L2-learning environment and L1-L2 sound similarity in the relationship between the perception and the production of English vowels

View Full Paper
SLShinsook LeeMCMi-Hui ChoHBHyunah Baek

Key Points

  • To examine how the learning environment and cross-linguistic phonetic similarity affect the relationship between vowel perception and production in second-language learners.
  • Assessed L1-Korean English learners residing in the United States (ESL) and South Korea (EFL) across vowel production, vowel identification, and English-to-Korean vowel mapping tasks using bVt target words.
  • Evaluated production intelligibility, calculated perceptual identification accuracy, and determined L1-L2 vowel similarity via perceptual mapping patterns.
  • ESL learners achieved higher overall accuracy than EFL learners in both perception and production tasks, though both cohorts demonstrated a significant positive correlation between perception and production.
  • ESL learners showed significant perception-production correlations for both L1-similar and L1-dissimilar vowels, whereas EFL learners demonstrated significant correlations only for L1-similar vowels.
  • L1-similar vowels yielded higher acquisition success relative to L1-dissimilar vowels lacking native analogues, reflecting distinct phonetic category formation trajectories.

Abstract

Abstract This study explores whether L2-learning environment (i.e., ESL English as a second language vs. EFL English as a foreign language) and vowel type (i.e., L1-similar L2 vowels vs. L1-dissimilar L2 vowels) have an impact on L2 vowel acquisition with reference to the perception-production relationship. L1-Korean learners of English in the U.S. (ESL learners) and Korea (EFL learners) performed English vowel production, English vowel identification, and English-to-Korean vowel mapping tasks using bVt words (e.g., bit, but, bought ). The learners’ English vowel productions were assessed for intelligibility, their vowel identification accuracy was calculated, and their perceptual mapping patterns were used to measure L1-L2 vowel similarity. The results show that the ESL learners outperformed the EFL learners in both perception and production, indicating an effect of L2-learning environment on L2 vowel acquisition. However, both groups showed a significant correlation between perception and production. As for vowel type, the results indicate a significant correlation between perception and production for both L1-similar and L1-dissimilar L2 vowels for the ESL learners but with variations in accuracy rates among L1-dissimilar L2 vowels. For the EFL learners, a significant correlation was found between the two modalities only for L1-similar L2 vowels, while variations in accuracy rates were observed for both vowel types. The results suggest that close counterparts in the L1 may even lead to more successful L2 vowel acquisition relative to L2 vowels without such L1 analogues, especially for ESL learners. The results further suggest that the acquisition of different L2 vowels follows different trajectories, which is ascribed partly to the formation of L2 vowel categories.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a895eaeca7ade938187cc69https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2025-0022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper