PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Administering Belonging: Immigration Policy and the Construction of American Identity From 1890–1952

View Full Paper
EPElizabeth Pereira

Key Points

  • To examine how federal immigration policy and administrative governance functioned to define and enforce boundaries of American identity between 1890 and 1952.
  • Analyzed historical federal records across the Progressive Era, World War I, World War II, and the early Cold War.
  • Evaluated legislative intent in congressional debates, executive correspondence, administrative agency practices, and Supreme Court rulings.
  • Demonstrated that immigration policy served as an enduring administrative apparatus embedding racial, cultural, and political criteria into national belonging.
  • Showed that wartime refugee policies, selective labor programs, and postwar reforms were constrained adaptations within an existing system rather than major liberalizing ruptures.
  • Identified immigration bureaucracy as a core instrument of modern state-building and identity creation rather than simple demographic regulation.

Abstract

This study argues that from 1890 to 1952, American immigration policy functioned as a sustained administrative system for constructing and enforcing national identity. Rather than representing discrete episodes of restriction, humanitarian reform, or wartime adaptation, immigration laws and their bureaucratic implementation institutionalized racial, cultural, and political criteria of belonging that persisted across the Progressive Era, two world wars, and the early Cold War. Drawing upon congressional debates, Supreme Court rulings, executive correspondence, and federal administrative records, this project demonstrates how immigration governance operated as a mechanism of state-building, translating prevailing anxieties about race, radicalism, and national security into durable legal and bureaucratic frameworks. By tracing continuity across periods often treated separately in the historiography, this research challenges interpretations that emphasize rupture or liberalization in the wake of global conflict. Instead, it contends that wartime refugee policies, selective labor programs, and postwar reforms represented constrained adaptations within an enduring identity-producing system. Through sustained analysis of legislative intent, judicial interpretation, and administrative practice, this project contributes to immigration scholarship by repositioning immigration policy not merely as demographic regulation, but instead, as a central instrument in defining the boundaries of American citizenship and belonging during the formative years of the modern state.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elizabeth Pereira (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a895f62ca7ade938187dfe0https://doi.org/10.82267/tind.519382
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper