PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2026AMBIO0 citationsOpen Access

Attitudes toward reactive and proactive wildlife management across Europe

RVRafael Villafuerte‐JordánMDMiguel Delibes‐MateosJGJenny Anne Glikman

Key Points

  • To investigate the psychological and demographic factors influencing public attitudes toward proactive versus reactive wildlife management strategies across six European nations.
  • Conducted an online survey of 2,400 participants across France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
  • Applied the cognitive hierarchy framework to measure wildlife value orientations (mutualism and domination), perceived risk, and perceptions of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.).
  • Mutualism orientations were positively associated with support for proactive wildlife and human protection strategies.
  • Domination orientations were associated with support for reactive and proactive management specifically targeting the protection of human interests.
  • Higher perceived risk from wildlife significantly increased public support for proactive management interventions.

Abstract

Abstract Human–wildlife interactions present both challenges and opportunities across Europe. Managing these interactions often requires decisions that fall between reactive (taking action after a problem arises) and proactive (anticipating and preventing negative impacts) management. This study examines factors influencing public attitudes toward proactive and reactive wildlife management in six European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom), based on an online survey of 2400 participants. We relied on the cognitive hierarchy framework to explain relationships between management attitudes and factors such as wildlife value orientations, risk perceptions, and perceptions of red deer ( Cervus elaphus L.). Attitudes toward wildlife management were generally shaped by value orientations and risk perception. Mutualism was associated with support for proactive wildlife and human protection, whereas domination was associated with reactive and proactive management aimed at protecting human interests. Higher perceived risk further increased support for proactive management strategies. These results provide practical insights into how public attitudes relate to wildlife management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Villafuerte‐Jordán et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a895fc4ca7ade938187e8d8https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02455-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper