PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology47 citationsOpen Access

Noninvasive Central Venous Pressure Measurement by Controlled Compression Sonography at the Forearm

CTChristoph ThalhammerMAMarkus AschwandenAOAngela Odermatt

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate a new noninvasive technique to determine central venous pressure (CVP) using high-resolution compression sonography. BACKGROUND: Information concerning CVP is crucial in clinical situations, including cardiac failure, volume overload, and sepsis. The measurement of CVP, however, requires puncture of a vein with attendant risk of complication. METHODS: After a proof-of-concept study in healthy subjects, a prospective blinded evaluation was performed comparing CVP measurement using a central venous catheter with measurement using compression sonography in critically ill (intensive care unit) patients. RESULTS: In healthy subjects with experimentally induced venous hypertension with a wide range of pressure values, a strong correlation (r = 0.95; p < 0.001) between noninvasive and invasive peripheral venous pressure at the forearm was shown. High interobserver agreement with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.988 shows excellent reliability of the system. Noninvasive peripheral venous pressure measurement at the forearm showed a good correlation with CVP in 50 intensive care unit patients with the forearm positioned both below heart level (r = 0.84; p < 0.001) and at heart level (r = 0.85; p < 0.001). The mean difference between invasive and noninvasive measurement was negligible (-0.1 +/- 3.5 cm H2O and -0.7 +/- 3.4 cm H2O, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Controlled-compression sonography is a valuable tool for measuring venous pressure in peripheral veins and allows reliable indirect assessment of CVP without intravenous catheterization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thalhammer et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8969814725fca49978452dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Complications of Femoral and Subclavian Venous Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients A Randomized Controlled Trial2001 · 1,188 citations
  2. 2Akufo and Ibarapa1965 · 16,880 citations
  3. 3Detection of Therapeutically Relevant Diagnoses Made by Sonography of the Upper Abdomen: Portable Versus High-end Sonographic Units - A Prospective Study2004 · 24 citations
  4. 4Physical examination of venous pressure: A critical review1998 · 180 citations
  5. 5STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT1986 · 48,054 citations