PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 12, 2008Cardiology52 citations

Electrocardiographic Findings in Athletic Students and Sedentary Controls

View Full Paper
HRHans Bj oslash rnstadLSLiv StorsteinHMHelge Dyre Meen

Key Result

Athletic students exhibited significantly lower heart rates and higher ventricular hypertrophy indices than sedentary controls, with 0.9% of athletes vs 0% of controls having non-sinus rhythms.

Key Points

  • To compare resting electrocardiographic parameters between athletic students and sedentary controls to characterize training-induced cardiac adaptations.
  • Analyzed resting electrocardiograms (ECGs) from 1,299 athletic students evaluated between 1973 and 1982.
  • Compared findings against 151 age- and sex-matched sedentary controls across 52 computerized parameters.
  • Athletic students exhibited lower resting heart rates, higher frequency of sinus bradycardia, longer PQ intervals, and prolonged QTc compared to sedentary controls.
  • Athletes had higher precordial Q and T wave amplitudes, increased ST elevation, and higher indices of right and left ventricular hypertrophy (RV1 + SV5, Sokolow-Lyon, and Grant indices).
  • While 100% of controls were in sinus rhythm, 0.9% of athletes displayed alternative rhythms (nodal, coronary sinus, or wandering pacemaker), with no significant differences observed for premature beats, bundle branch block, or Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=1,450)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does athletic training alter resting electrocardiographic parameters in students compared to a sedentary lifestyle?

P
Population
1,450 participants, comprising 1,299 athletic students and 151 age- and sex-matched sedentary controls, evaluated for resting electrocardiographic differences.
E
Exposure
Athletic training (athletic students)
C
Comparator
Sedentary lifestyle (age- and sex-matched sedentary controls)
O
Outcome
Resting electrocardiographic parameters (52 parameters recorded and computerized)surrogate

Athletic training induces significant physiological changes in resting ECGs, including hypertrophy indices and conduction times, indicating that different normal criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy may be warranted in athletes.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.9% vs 0%

Abstract

We have investigated resting electrocardiograms from 1,299 athletic students taken in the same laboratory during the years 1973-1982 and compared them with electrocardiograms recorded in 151 age- and sex-matched sedentary controls. Fifty-two parameters were recorded for each electrocardiogram and computerized. We found that athletic students had a significant lower heart rate, longer PQ time and a prolonged QTc compared to control subjects. Athletes had higher maximal Q amplitudes in precordial leads, higher R in V1, and higher indices of right ventricular hypertrophy (RV1 + SV5) and left ventricular hypertrophy (Sokolow-Lyon and Grant indices). Furthermore, the athletes had higher maximal ST elevation and higher maximal T wave amplitudes in precordial leads. Sinus bradycardia was more frequent in athletes. All control subjects were in sinus rhythm whereas 0.9% of the athletes had other rhythms (nodal, coronary sinus or wandering pacemaker). Athletes and control subjects did not differ significantly with regard to premature beats, atrioventricular block, bundle branch block or the Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern. We conclude that training induces significant changes in heart rate, conduction times, ST elevation. QRS and T voltage, slow rhythm disturbances and atrioventricular and sinoatrial block were infrequent in the resting electrocardiogram taken in the supine position and disappeared immediately on sitting and during exercise. Training-induced electrocardiographic changes may partly be due to alterations in autonomic tone and partly to structural changes in the myocardium. Different normal criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy may be warranted in athletes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

rnstad et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=1,450). Athletic training vs. Sedentary controls was evaluated on Other rhythms (nodal, coronary sinus or wandering pacemaker). Athletic students exhibited significantly lower heart rates and higher ventricular hypertrophy indices than sedentary controls, with 0.9% of athletes vs 0% of controls having non-sinus rhythms.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a89b0380f137e402b335bb8https://doi.org/10.1159/000174893
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper