PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1996Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research32 citations

Recombinant Interferons β and γ Have a Higher Antiviral Activity than Interferon-α in Coxsackievirus B3-Infected Carrier State Cultures of Human Myocardial Fibroblasts

View Full Paper
AHAlbert HeimMSMichael Stille‐SiegenerPPPatricia Pring‐Åkerblom

Structured PICO

Do recombinant interferons beta and gamma have higher antiviral activity than interferon-alpha2a in CVB3-infected human myocardial fibroblasts?

P
Population
Cultured human myocardial fibroblasts with persistent coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) infection
I
Intervention
Recombinant human interferon-beta and interferon-gamma
C
Comparator
Recombinant human interferon-alpha2a
O
Outcome
Antiviral activity assessed as the percentage reduction in virus yield measured on alternate days for 7 or 16 dayssurrogate

IFN-beta and IFN-gamma demonstrate significantly higher antiviral activity against CVB3 in human myocardial fibroblasts compared to IFN-alpha2a, suggesting IFN-beta as a preferred candidate for clinical evaluation in enteroviral heart disease.

Abstract

We compared the antiviral activities of three recombinant human interferons (IFN-alph2a, IFN-beta, and IFN-gamma) in cultured human myocardial fibroblasts to select a candidate for trial in heart disease induced by cardiotropic enterovirus, e.g., coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3). Cells were exposed to CVB3, and after 7 days, when a persistent infection had developed, IFN was added. Virus yields were measured on alternate days for the next 7 or 16 days, and IFN activity was assessed as the percentage reduction in yield. IFN-gamma and IFN-beta were both highly active and reduced virus yields by 2 log (EC(99)) at concentrations of 23.4 IU/ml (SD = 8.6) and 10.1 IU/ml (SD = 3.2), respectively; with 250 IU/ml of either IFN, no infectious virus was formed. Unexpectedly, IFN-alpha2a (EC(99)> 1250 IU/ml) was at least 120 times less active than IFN-beta; after use for 8 days or more, the minor effects it produced were no longer related to the concentration applied. Despite the pharmacokinetic advantages of IFN-alpha2a, our data suggest that IFN-beta should in preference be evaluated in the clinic.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heim et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a89d4de65980c203df7be3ahttps://doi.org/10.1089/jir.1996.16.283
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper