PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 15, 1997Geophysical Research Letters110 citationsOpen Access

A limited‐area‐model case study of the effects of sub‐grid scale Variations in relative humidity and cloud upon the direct radiative forcing of sulfate aerosol

View Full Paper
JHJim HaywoodVRV. RamaswamyLDLeo J. Donner

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A limited‐area non‐hydrostatic model with a horizontal spatial resolution of 2km by 2km is used to assess the importance of sub‐grid scale variations in relative humidity and cloud upon the direct radiative forcing (DRF) by tropospheric sulfate aerosols. The DRF from the limited‐area model for both clear and cloudy regions is analyzed and the results compared against those obtained using general circulation model (GCM) parameterizations that perform the computations over coarse horizontal grids. In this idealized model study, the GCM calculations underestimate the clear sky DRF by approximately 73% and the cloudy sky DRF by approximately 60%. These results indicate that, for areas where the relative humidity is high and where there is substantial spatial variability in relative humidity and cloud, GCM calculations may considerably underestimate the DRF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haywood et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8a7c97b4e829b19bd486e1https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl03812
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper