PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 23, 2026Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology0 citations

Transmurality and Autonomic Effects of Pulsed Field Ablation on the Mitral Isthmus

View Full Paper
APApoor PatelАКА. А. КочарянHLHelena López-Martínez

Key Result

Endocardial pulsed field ablation of the mitral isthmus achieved block in only 45% of patients and did not ablate parasympathetic innervation, often requiring vein of Marshall ethanol infusion.

Key Points

  • To assess the transmurality and autonomic denervation effects of endocardial pulsed field ablation at the mitral isthmus using real-time vein of Marshall electrograms and high-frequency stimulation.
  • Prospectively enrolled 71 patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation across three pulsed field ablation platforms: FaraPulse (n=31), PulseSelect (n=9), or Affera (n=31).
  • Assessed transmurality by vein of Marshall signal elimination after 20 minutes and evaluated autonomic responses using high-frequency stimulation before and after ablation, with ethanol infusion administered for incomplete block.
  • Mitral isthmus block was achieved with pulsed field ablation alone in 45% (32/71) of patients, while pseudoblock was observed in 38%.
  • Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion achieved block in an additional 38% (27/71) for a cumulative rate of 83% (59/71), with the remaining 17% (12/71) requiring coronary sinus ablation.
  • High-frequency stimulation from the vein of Marshall continued to elicit intact parasympathetic responses (atrioventricular block) after pulsed field ablation.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=71)

Structured PICO

Does endocardial pulsed field ablation achieve transmurality and autonomic denervation at the mitral isthmus in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?

P
Population
71 patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.
E
Exposure
Endocardial pulsed field ablation (PFA) at the mitral isthmus using FaraPulse (n=31), PulseSelect (n=9), or Affera (n=31)
O
Outcome
Transmurality of endocardial PFA at the mitral isthmus (defined as vein of Marshall signal elimination after 20 minutes) and autonomic effectssurrogate

Endocardial pulsed field ablation of the mitral isthmus is not reliably transmural and fails to ablate parasympathetic innervation, often requiring adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation of the mitral isthmus (MI) is unreliable. Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion can improve MI ablation success and eliminate local MI autonomic innervation. The role of pulsed field ablation (PFA) in MI ablation and its autonomic effect is unclear. We evaluated the transmurality of endocardial PFA at the MI and its autonomic effects, using real-time epicardial VOM electrograms and VOM high-frequency stimulation. METHODS: Patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation (n=71) were prospectively enrolled. MI ablation (endocardial to VOM) was delivered using FaraPulse (N=31), PulseSelect (N=9), or Affera (N=31) while monitoring VOM epicardial electrograms to assess transmurality, defined as VOM signal elimination after 20 minutes. MI block was assessed using differential pacing from the left atrial appendage and VOM. High-frequency stimulation from the VOM was performed before and after PFA. VOM ethanol infusion was administered when MI ablation was incomplete. RESULTS: <0.05). Pseudoblock (epicardial-only MI conduction and MI delays) was present in 38%. MI block was achieved with PFA alone in 45% (32/71) of patients; VOM ethanol infusion achieved MI block in an additional 38% (27/71) of patients for a cumulative 83% (59/71); and coronary sinus ablation was required in the remaining 17% (12/71). After PFA, VOM high-frequency stimulation elicited intact parasympathetic responses evidenced as atrioventricular block. CONCLUSIONS: Across all 3 PFA platforms, endocardial ablation of the MI is not reliably transmural and does not ablate VOM parasympathetic innervation. VOM ethanol infusion can complete transmurality and denervation of the MI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=71). Endocardial pulsed field ablation (PFA) at the mitral isthmus was evaluated on Mitral isthmus block. Endocardial pulsed field ablation of the mitral isthmus achieved block in only 45% of patients and did not ablate parasympathetic innervation, often requiring vein of Marshall ethanol infusion.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8aae407677a34114447176https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.126.015125
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Left Atrial Isthmus:2004 · 182 citations
  2. 2Approaches to Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation2015 · 2,331 citations
  3. 3Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Optimized Linear Ablation vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF2024 · 104 citations
  4. 4Differential Pacing Maneuver From the Vein of Marshall2024 · 7 citations
  5. 5Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: PULSED AF Pivotal Trial2023 · 594 citations