PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2001AJP Renal Physiology45 citationsOpen Access

Influence of Ca2+-activated K+channels on rat renal arteriolar responses to depolarizing agonists

RFRachel W. FalletJBJoseph P. BastKFKeiji Fujiwara

Structured PICO

P
Population
Rat renal juxtamedullary arterioles (afferent n=36, efferent n=13)
I
Intervention
NS-1619 (BKCa channel opener) and tetraethylammonium (TEA, BKCa channel blocker)
C
Comparator
Baseline conditions
O
Outcome
Arteriolar lumen diameter changes in response to depolarizing agonists (ANG II, arginine vasopressin)surrogate

BKCa channels in afferent arteriolar smooth muscle do not provide a prominent physiological brake on agonist-induced constriction under the studied experimental conditions.

Abstract

Experiments were performed to evaluate the hypothesis that opening of Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels (BK(Ca) channels) promotes juxtamedullary arteriolar dilation and curtails constrictor responses to depolarizing agonists. Under baseline conditions, afferent and efferent arteriolar lumen diameters averaged 23.4 +/- 0.9 (n = 36) and 22.8 +/- 1.1 (n = 13) microm, respectively. The synthetic BK(Ca) channel opener NS-1619 evoked concentration-dependent afferent arteriolar dilation. BK(Ca) channel blockade (1 mM tetraethylammonium; TEA) decreased afferent diameter by 15 +/- 3% and prevented the dilator response to 30 microM NS-1619. ANG II (10 nM) decreased afferent arteriolar diameter by 44 +/- 4%, a response that was reduced by 30% during NS-1619 treatment; however, TEA failed to alter afferent constrictor responses to either ANG II or arginine vasopressin. Neither NS-1619 nor TEA altered agonist-induced constriction of the efferent arteriole. Thus, although the BK(Ca) channel agonist was able to curtail afferent (but not efferent) arteriolar constrictor responses to ANG II, BK(Ca) channel blockade did not allow exaggerated agonist-induced arteriolar constriction. These observations suggest that the BK(Ca) channels evident in afferent arteriolar smooth muscle do not provide a prominent physiological brake on agonist-induced constriction under our experimental conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fallet et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8ad7cfeada60f85de3a674https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.2001.280.4.f583
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper