PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1983AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology18 citations

Elevated sympathetic response of epicardium proximal to healed myocardial infarction

View Full Paper
MGM. S. GaideRMRobert J. MyerburgPKPatricia L. Kozlovskis

Structured PICO

P
Population
Cats with healed myocardial infarction induced by single-stage distal coronary artery ligation (studied 3 months after healing), sham-operated cats, and normal unoperated cats
I
Intervention
Bilateral stimulation of the ansa subclavia (sympathetic nerve stimulation)
C
Comparator
Sham-operated and normal unoperated hearts (noninfarcted hearts)
O
Outcome
Local ventricular muscle refractory periods measured by the extrastimulus techniquesurrogate

Sympathetic nerve stimulation causes a marked disparity in epicardial refractoriness in hearts with healed myocardial infarction, which may contribute to arrhythmogenesis.

Abstract

Sympathetic nerve interaction with cardiac electrophysiology was evaluated in healed myocardial infarction by monitoring the effects of sympathetic nerve stimulation on local epicardial refractoriness in cats. Single-stage distal coronary artery ligation was used to induce myocardial infarction. Regions overlying and surrounding infarcts 3 mo after healing and comparable regions in sham-operated and normal unoperated hearts were studied. Local ventricular muscle refractory periods were measured by the extrastimulus technique from 1) the epicardium overlying the infarct, 2) the area bordering the infarct, and 3) a normal area proximal to the infarct on the anterior free wall of the left ventricle. Bilateral stimulation of the ansa subclavia induced significant and disparate refractory period shortening (P less than or equal to 0.01) in hearts with healed myocardial infarction. Shortening was greatest in the normal area -26 +/- 8 (+/-SD) ms, less in the border area (-15 +/- 6), and least in the infarct area (-7 +/- 2). In contrast, refractory periods measured in noninfarcted hearts shortened significantly (P less than or equal to 0.01) but uniformly and to a lesser extent during sympathetic stimulation. We conclude 1) the effects of sympathetic nerve stimulation are more pronounced in the areas proximal to healed infarction than in similar areas of noninfarcted hearts and 2) a marked disparity in sympathetic responsiveness occurs in hearts with healed myocardial infarction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gaide et al. (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8b8f4a9d5fb440a3beacdehttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1983.245.4.h646
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Focal myocardial infarction induces global remodeling of cardiac sympathetic innervation: neural remodeling in a spatial context2013 · 101 citations
  2. 2Reduction of sympathetic inotropic response after ischemia in dogs. Contributor to stunned myocardium.1985 · 83 citations
  3. 3Adrenergic effects on reentrant ventricular rhythms in subacute myocardial infarction.1992 · 22 citations
  4. 4Cellular electrophysiological changes during ischemia in isolated, coronary-perfused cat ventricle with healed myocardial infarction.1988 · 34 citations
  5. 5Interruption of sympathetic and vagal-mediated afferent responses by transmural myocardial infarction.1985 · 113 citations