PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 24, 2026Society & Natural Resources0 citationsOpen Access

Land Use and Conflict Resolution in Rural Okavango Delta, Botswana

View Full Paper
RGReniko GondoOKOluwatoyin D. KolawoleCMChiedza Ngonidzashe Mutanga

Key Points

  • To examine the drivers of land disputes and analyze the effectiveness of conflict resolution mechanisms within rural communities operating under mixed tenure frameworks.
  • Conducted a mixed-methods investigation using household and key informant interviews across two rural Okavango Delta communities in Botswana (N=553).
  • Analyzed the relationship between socio-demographic factors, types of land disputes, and institutional resolution mechanisms.
  • Land conflicts stemmed primarily from unauthorized sales and transfers (32%), self-allocation (27%), unclear boundaries (18%), inheritance disputes (15%), and development-induced relocations (8%).
  • Women and youth experienced disproportionate barriers and inequalities regarding land access.
  • Customary institutions served as the predominant dispute resolution mechanism despite the presence of statutory legal frameworks.

Abstract

Land reform in Africa seeks to restore land to communities displaced by colonial expropriation while aligning customary tenure with modern legal frameworks. Despite these efforts, land conflicts persist. Guided by evolutionary land rights and conflict theories, this study examined drivers of land disputes and conflict resolution mechanisms in two rural Okavango Delta communities. A mixed methods approach collected data from 553 respondents through household and key informant interviews. Conflicts arose from unauthorized sales and transfers (32%), self-allocation (27%), unclear boundaries (18%), inheritance disputes (15%), and development-induced relocations (8%). Women and youths were disproportionately affected, highlighting persistent inequalities in land access. Socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with conflict types. Although statutory frameworks exist, customary institutions remain the main dispute resolution mechanism. The study recommends integrating customary and statutory systems, adopting gender-sensitive policies, improving land allocation transparency, strengthening local institutions, and addressing historical injustices to promote equitable and sustainable land governance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gondo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8c005bbca056c88e6df019https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2026.2718500
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stakeholder access to lands for agriculture and land governance: A systematic review2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Conflict Resolution Mechanisms for Strengthening Land Tenure Security: A Case of Mvomero District, Tanzania2025
  3. 3Customary Land Rights and the Formal Legal System: Conflicts and Accommodation: Towards Sustainable Development Goals2025
  4. 4Community perceptions on land and water acquisitions in the Okavango Delta: implications for rural livelihoods2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5The struggle over land in Africa: conflicts, politics & change2026