PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Strategic Partnerships in Embedded Finance: A Framework for Growth and Partner Prioritisation

View Full Paper
HGHardik Gupta

Key Points

  • Develop an integrative, industry-differentiated strategic framework to evaluate and prioritise non-financial distribution partners across multiple embedded finance sectors.
  • Synthesised theoretical foundations from the resource-based view, strategic fit literature, ecosystem strategy, and customer experience design.
  • Formulated a multi-dimensional evaluation model separating general strategic logic from sector-specific dynamics across insurance, lending, payments, banking, and wealth management.
  • Applied the framework to publicly documented case examples using a trigger taxonomy, cross-industry comparison tables, and a prioritisation matrix.
  • Demonstrated that embedded finance partner attractiveness depends predominantly on customer proximity to a financial trigger point rather than aggregate audience size.
  • Established a six-factor evaluation model spanning ecosystem quality, journey timing, product fit, commercial potential, capability complementarity, and execution feasibility.

Abstract

Financial services firms increasingly seek to distribute insurance, credit, payments, banking and wealth products through non-financial businesses that already hold a trusted customer relationship at a relevant moment. Practitioner guidance for selecting such partners commonly ranks candidates by the size of their customer base, a proxy that overlooks where in the customer journey a financial need actually arises and how that need interacts with the economics of a specific financial product. This paper develops a conceptual framework that separates a common strategic logic, covering ecosystem quality, journey timing, product fit, commercial potential, capability complementarity and execution feasibility, from the industry specific logic required to apply that structure consistently across insurance, lending, payments, banking and wealth management. Drawing on the resource-based view, the alliance and strategic fit literature, ecosystem strategy and the customer experience literature, the paper argues that partner attractiveness depends on proximity to a financial trigger point rather than audience scale alone. A cross-industry comparison table, a trigger taxonomy and an illustrative partner prioritisation tool apply the framework to publicly documented examples. The contribution is an integrative, industry differentiated evaluation logic that, to the author's knowledge, existing literature has not assembled, since prior work treats alliance formation, embedded finance and customer journey design largely as separate streams.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hardik Gupta (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8c009fbca056c88e6df6d9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22055043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Strategic Engagement Map - A Quantitative Framework for Partner Selection and Customer Prioritization2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Practice Briefing: Strategic partnering models for low-constraint investors: typology and structural design2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3The art of successful bank–FinTech partnerships: Making preparedness a cornerstone of a new era in financial services2026
  4. 4Practice Briefing: Strategic partnering for low-constraint investors: selection, alignment and governance in practice2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Mapping Pathways for Inclusive Digital Payment Ecosystems: Integrating NGOs, Micro-Insurance Startups, and Community Groups2025 · 9 citations