PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 29, 2009European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery101 citations

Selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C — is the spinal cord safe?☆

View Full Paper
CEChristian D. EtzMLMaximilian LuehrFKFabian A. Kari

Key Result

Selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C for 120 minutes resulted in significantly worse neurologic outcomes compared to 90 minutes, invariably leading to paraplegia in survivors (p<0.0001).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=20)

Blinding

Blinded outcome assessment

Randomization

Randomized

Structured PICO

Does selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C for 120 minutes compared to 90 minutes worsen spinal cord ischemic injury and neurologic outcomes in a porcine model?

P
Population
20 juvenile Yorkshire pigs undergoing circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C for 90 or 120 minutes, followed for 5 days.
I
Intervention
Selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at 28°C for 120 min at 50 mmHg using alpha-stat pH management
C
Comparator
Selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at 28°C for 90 min at 50 mmHg using alpha-stat pH management
O
Outcome
Spinal cord blood flow (SCBF), neurobehavioural recovery (modified Tarlov score), and histological ischaemic spinal cord injurysurrogate

Selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C provides insufficient spinal cord blood flow below T8/9, leading to severe ischemic injury and paraplegia when extended to 120 minutes in a porcine model.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To shorten cooling/rewarming associated with hypothermic neuroprotection strategies during complex aortic arch surgery, selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at 28 degrees C has recently been advocated, although its safe limits - especially with regard to the ischaemic tolerance of the spinal cord - have not been systematically examined. METHODS: Twenty juvenile Yorkshire pigs (30.3+/-2.8kg) were randomly allocated to undergo circulatory arrest and SCP at 28 degrees C for 90 min (group A; N=12) or 120 min (group B; N=8) at 50 mmHg using alpha-stat pH management. Spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) was assessed using fluorescent microspheres at baseline (prior to SCP); at 5 and 80 min during SCP, and at 1, 5 and 48 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A modified Tarlov score was used to evaluate neurobehavioural recovery in all survivors blindly from videotapes for 5 days postoperatively. Histological ischaemic spinal cord injury was scored after sacrifice. RESULTS: All pigs could be weaned from CPB and ventilation, but seven pigs (58%) in group A and five (63%) in group B developed multi-organ failure and died within 24h. SCBF diminished immediately after initiation of SCP and was absent throughout SCP in all segments below T8/9, recovering to baseline 1h after SCP at all cord levels. All survivors suffered moderate-to-severe histological lumbar spinal cord damage, more severe in group B (p< or =0.049). Three of five group A pigs recovered normal function, but two suffered paraparesis. Group B survivors had a worse neurologic outcome (p<0.0001): all suffered paraplegia (one immediate, and two on day 2, after initial recovery). CONCLUSION: SCP provides insufficient SCBF below T8/9 to sustain cord viability. At 28 degrees C, the ischaemic tolerance of the cord may be exceeded enough by 90 min to impair function; by 120 min, SCP at 28 degrees C invariably results in paraplegia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Etz et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Ischaemic spinal cord injury during complex aortic arch surgery (n=20). Selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at 28°C for 120 min vs. Selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at 28°C for 90 min was evaluated on Neurologic outcome (neurobehavioural recovery) (p=<0.0001). Selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C for 120 minutes resulted in significantly worse neurologic outcomes compared to 90 minutes, invariably leading to paraplegia in survivors (p<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8c2be3bc51310b2bdecdf5https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.046
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper