PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 22, 2017EP Europace30 citations

Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice

View Full Paper
FÅFinn ÅkerströmINIrene NarváezAPAlberto Puchol

Structured PICO

Does multipoint pacing activation reduce battery longevity compared to conventional CRT in patients with MPP-CRT devices?

P
Population
46 patients with MPP-CRT devices implanted at least 3 months prior, from two centres.
I
Intervention
Multipoint pacing (MPP) activation based on maximal possible anatomical LV1/LV2 separation according to three predefined LV pacing capture threshold (PCT) cut-offs (≤1.5 V; ≤4.0 V; and ≤6.5 V).
C
Comparator
Conventional CRT (single LV site) using the lowest PCT or longest right ventricle-LV delay.
O
Outcome
Estimated battery longevity calculated using programmed lower rate limit, lead impedances, outputs, and pacing percentages.surrogate

Multipoint pacing activation significantly reduces CRT device battery longevity, though the reduction is relatively small when reasonable pacing capture thresholds (≤4.0 V) are achieved.

Abstract

Aims: Multipoint pacing (MPP) permits simultaneous multisite pacing of the left ventricle (LV); initial studies suggest haemodynamic and clinical benefits over conventional (single LV site) cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of MPP activation on battery longevity in routine clinical practice. Methods and results: Patient (n = 46) and device data were collected from two centres at least 3 months after MPP-CRT device implantation. Multipoint pacing programming was based on the maximal possible anatomical LV1/LV2 separation according to three predefined LV pacing capture threshold (PCT) cut-offs (≤1.5 V; ≤4.0 V; and ≤6.5 V). Estimated battery longevity was calculated using the programmed lower rate limit, lead impedances, outputs, and pacing percentages. Relative to the longevity for conventional CRT using the lowest PCT (8.9 ± 1.2 years), MPP activation significantly shortened battery longevity for all three PCT cut-offs (≤1.5 V, -5.6%; ≤4.0 V, -16.9%; ≤6.5 V, -21.3%; P's <0.001). When compared with conventional CRT based on longest right ventricle-LV delay (8.3 ± 1.3 years), battery longevity was significantly shortened for the MPP ≤ 4.0 V and ≤6.5 V cut-offs (-10.8 and -15.7%, respectively; P's <0.001). Maximal LV1/LV2 spacing was possible in 23.9% (≤1.5 V), 56.5% (≤4.0 V), and 69.6% (≤6.5 V) of patients. Conclusion: Multipoint pacing activation significantly reduces battery longevity compared with that for conventional CRT configuration. When reasonable MPP LV vector PCTs (≤4.0 V) are achieved, the decrease in battery longevity is relatively small which may prompt the clinician to activate MPP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Åkerström et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8d0705eb815df85614e34chttps://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux209
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of multipoint pacing on projected battery longevity in cardiac resynchronization therapy. An IRON‐MPP study sub‐analysis2019 · 12 citations
  2. 2Multipoint pacing is associated with improved prognosis and cardiac resynchronization therapy response. MORE-CRT MPP randomized study secondary analyses.2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP)2016 · 84 citations
  4. 4Optimized single‐point left ventricular pacing leads to improved resynchronization compared with multipoint pacing2021 · 5 citations
  5. 5Single-Point Left Ventricular Pacing Optimized by ECG Results in Better Resynchronization than Multipoint Pacing2020