PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2001Anesthesia & Analgesia16 citations

An Investigation of a New Activated Clotting Time “MAX-ACT” in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Circulation

View Full Paper
GLGalina LeyviLSLinda Shore‐LessersonDHDonna Harrington

Structured PICO

Does MAX-ACT provide a better correlation with heparin levels compared to standard ACT in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass?

P
Population
27 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)
I
Intervention
MAX-ACT (modified activated clotting time using maximal activation of Factor XII)
C
Comparator
Standard activated clotting time (ACT)
O
Outcome
Correlation with heparin levels and variability during hypothermia and hemodilutionsurrogate

The modified MAX-ACT test does not correlate better with heparin levels than standard ACT during cardiopulmonary bypass, and both tests fail to correlate with actual heparin concentrations.

Abstract

Activated clotting time (ACT) is a test used in the operating room for monitoring heparin effect. However, ACT does not correlate with heparin levels because of its lack of specificity for heparin and its variability during hypothermia and hemodilution on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A modified ACT using maximal activation of Factor XII, MAX-ACT (Actalyke MAX-ACT; Array Medical, Somerville, NJ), may be less variable and more closely related to heparin levels. We compared MAX-ACT with ACT in 27 patients undergoing CPB. We measured ACT, MAX-ACT, temperature, and hematocrit at six time points: baseline; postheparin; on CPB 30, 60, and 90 min; and postprotamine. Additionally, we assessed anti-Factor Xa heparin activity and antithrombin III activity at four of these six time points. With institution of CPB and hemodilution, MAX-ACT and ACT did not change significantly but had a tendency to increase, whereas concomitant heparin levels decreased (P = 0.065). Neither test correlated with heparin levels. ACT and MAX-ACT did not differ during normothermia but did during hypothermia, and ACT was significantly longer than MAX-ACT (P = 0.009). At the postheparin time point, ACT-heparin sensitivity (defined as ACT postheparin − ACT baseline/heparin concentration postheparin − heparin concentration baseline) was greater than MAX-ACT-heparin sensitivity (analogous calculation for MAX-ACT; 520 266 − 9366 s · U−1 · mL−1 vs 468 203 − 8833 s · U−1 · mL−1;P = 0.022).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leyvi et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8d461560a354c5ab7fe641https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-200103000-00005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper