PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2021Cerebrovascular Diseases6 citations

Lipid Core Burden Index Assessed by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy of Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: Association with Magnetic Resonance T1-Weighted Imaging

View Full Paper
INIchiro NakagawaMKMasashi KotsugiHPHunSoo Park

Key Result

MR T1-weighted plaque signal intensity ratio was significantly associated with high lipid core plaques assessed by NIRS in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (OR 44.19; 95% CI 6.55-298.19; P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=82)

Structured PICO

Does catheter-based NIRS assessment of lipid core burden correlate with MR plaque imaging in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis?

P
Population
82 consecutive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting with NIRS and MR plaque assessment.
E
Exposure
Catheter-based near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and magnetic resonance (MR) plaque imaging
O
Outcome
Correlation between maximum lipid core burden index (max-LCBI) assessed by NIRS and MR T1-weighted plaque signal intensity ratio (T1W-SIR) and MR time-of-flight signal intensity ratio (TOF-SIR)surrogate

High lipid core plaque assessed by catheter-based NIRS significantly correlates with MR imaging signal intensity ratios in symptomatic patients with unstable carotid plaques.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 44.19 (95% CI 6.55–298.19)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vulnerable plaques are a strong predictor of cerebrovascular ischemic events, and high lipid core plaques (LCPs) are associated with an increased risk of embolic infarcts during carotid artery stenting (CAS). Recent developments in magnetic resonance (MR) plaque imaging have enabled noninvasive assessment of carotid plaque vulnerability, and the lipid component and intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) are visible as high signal intensity areas on T1-weighted MR images. Recently, catheter-based near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been shown to accurately distinguish LCPs without IPH. This study aimed to determine whether the results of assessment of high LCPs by catheter-based NIRS correlate with the results of MR plaque imaging. METHODS: We recruited 82 consecutive symptomatic carotid artery stenosis patients who were treated with CAS under NIRS and MR plaque assessment. Maximum lipid core burden index (max-LCBI) at minimal luminal areas (MLA), defined as max-LCBIMLA, and max-LCBI for any 4-mm segment in a target lesion, defined as max-LCBIAREA, were assessed by NIRS. Correlations were investigated between max-LCBI and MR T1-weighted plaque signal intensity ratio (T1W-SIR) and MR time-of-flight signal intensity ratio (TOF-SIR) in the same regions as assessed by NIRS. RESULTS: Both T1W-SIRMLA and T1W-SIRAREA were significantly lower in the high LCP group (max-LCBI >504, p < 0.001 for both), while TOF-SIRMLA and TOF-SIRAREA were significantly higher in the high LCP group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). A significant linear correlation was present between max-LCBIMLA and both TIW-SIRMLA and TOF-SIRMLA (r = -0.610 and 0.452, respectively, p < 0.0001 for both). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis revealed that T1W-SIRMLA and TOF-SIRMLA were significantly associated with a high LCP assessed by NIRS (OR, 44.19 and 0.43; 95% CI: 6.55-298.19 and 0.19-0.96; p < 0.001 and = 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A high LCP assessed by NIRS correlates with the signal intensity ratio of MR imaging in symptomatic patients with unstable carotid plaques.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nakagawa et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (n=82). MR T1-weighted plaque signal intensity ratio (T1W-SIR) was evaluated on High lipid core plaque (LCP) assessed by NIRS (OR 44.19, 95% CI 6.55-298.19, p=<0.001). MR T1-weighted plaque signal intensity ratio was significantly associated with high lipid core plaques assessed by NIRS in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (OR 44.19; 95% CI 6.55-298.19; P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a902a241dcd98381b83ff1dhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000516888
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper