PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2008European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation34 citations

Is the MacNew quality of life questionnaire a useful diagnostic and evaluation instrument for cardiac rehabilitation?

View Full Paper
SMStan MaesVGVéronique De GuchtRGRick Goud

Key Result

The MacNew quality of life questionnaire showed high internal consistency, differentiated well between diagnostic groups at entry, and was responsive to changes during cardiac rehabilitation.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=6,749)

Structured PICO

Is the MacNew quality of life questionnaire a useful diagnostic and evaluation instrument for cardiac rehabilitation patients?

P
Population
6,749 cardiac rehabilitation patients assessed at entry and 1,654 at the end of rehabilitation to evaluate the MacNew quality of life questionnaire.
E
Exposure
Assessment using the MacNew health-related quality of life questionnaire
O
Outcome
Discriminating capacity of the MacNew questionnaire between diagnostic disease categories, sex, and age at entry (T1) and end (T2) of cardiac rehabilitation, and its responsiveness during this periodpatient reported

The MacNew questionnaire is a valid and responsive tool for assessing quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation, though it may benefit from being complemented with anxiety and depression measures due to ceiling effects at the end of rehabilitation.

Limitations

  • At T2, the MacNew seems to lose some of its discriminating power, partly because of ceiling effects.
  • Ceiling effects at T2

Abstract

PURPOSE: The MacNew health-related quality of life questionnaire is internationally used as a standard for psychosocial assessment in many cardiac rehabilitation centres. This study investigates its discriminating capacity between diagnostic disease categories, sex and age at entry (T1) and at the end (T2) of cardiac rehabilitation as well as the responsiveness of the MacNew during this period. METHOD: Data were used from 6,749 cardiac rehabilitation patients at T1 and 1,654 at T2. RESULTS: Results show that the global MacNew as well as the three (physical, emotional, social) subscales have high internal consistencies, and differentiate well and in the expected direction at T1 between diagnostic groups (heart surgery, myocardial infarction with and without percutaneous coronary intervention, stable angina with and without percutaneous coronary intervention, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and heart failure patients), sex and age. The MacNew also proves to be an adequate evaluation instrument for cardiac rehabilitation, as all scales are responsive enough to capture changes from T1 to T2. At T2, however, the MacNew seems to lose some of its discriminating power, partly because of ceiling effects. CONCLUSION: It is suggested to complement the use of the MacNew both at T1 and T2 with a brief anxiety and depression measure, which is valid and responsive for different groups of cardiac rehabilitation patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maes et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Cardiac rehabilitation (n=6,749). MacNew health-related quality of life questionnaire was evaluated on Discriminating capacity between diagnostic disease categories, sex and age, and responsiveness. The MacNew quality of life questionnaire showed high internal consistency, differentiated well between diagnostic groups at entry, and was responsive to changes during cardiac rehabilitation.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9030e5e02ba012352da2cdhttps://doi.org/10.1097/hjr.0b013e328303402b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation2005 · 19 citations
  2. 2Adverse Baseline Physiological and Psychosocial Profiles of Women Enrolled in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Clinical Trial2008 · 29 citations
  3. 3Women with coronary artery disease report worse health-related quality of life outcomes compared to men.2004 · 133 citations
  4. 4Depression, Isolation, Social Support, and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults2006 · 70 citations
  5. 5The MacNew Heart Disease health-related quality of life instrument: a summary.2004 · 294 citations