PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1991Anesthesia & Analgesia58 citations

Left Ventricular Performance During Propofol or Methohexital Anesthesia

View Full Paper
JLJean-Yves M. LepageMPM∘ PinaudJHJacques H. Helias

Structured PICO

Does propofol compared to methohexital preserve left ventricular performance in patients with chronic coronary artery disease?

P
Population
22 unpremedicated patients with chronic coronary artery disease (NYHA class II-III), ASA physical status III, age 50-78 years.
I
Intervention
Propofol induction (2 mg/kg) followed by maintenance infusion (100 micrograms/kg/min) over 15 minutes, with vecuronium (0.05 mg/kg) and manually controlled ventilation.
C
Comparator
Methohexital induction (2 mg/kg) followed by maintenance infusion (100 micrograms/kg/min) over 15 minutes, with vecuronium (0.05 mg/kg) and manually controlled ventilation.
O
Outcome
Left ventricular volumes and function (including mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, heart rate, end-diastolic volume, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, end-systolic volume, and global ejection fraction) measured serially over 15 minutes.surrogate

Propofol preserves left ventricular performance compared to methohexital in patients with chronic coronary artery disease undergoing anesthesia.

Abstract

Using gated radionuclide ventriculography and invasive cardiac monitoring, the effects of propofol and methohexital on left ventricular volumes and function were investigated in 22 unpremedicated patients (ASA physical status III, 50-78 yr) with chronic coronary artery disease (NYHA class II-III). Anesthesia was induced with either propofol or methohexital (2 mg/kg), followed by a maintenance infusion of 100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Vecuronium (0.05 mg/kg) was administered and ventilation (FIO2, 1.0) was manually controlled (FECO2, 0.04-0.05). Data acquisitions were serially obtained over 15 min. Propofol and methohexital anesthesia caused an average 15% decrease in mean arterial pressure, associated with a 20% decrease in cardiac index without a decrease in systemic vascular resistance index. It is interesting that the determinants of these hemodynamic effects were different. Heart rate did not change during propofol infusion despite the decrease in mean arterial pressure, whereas heart rate increased during methohexital infusion. In the propofol group, the decrease in cardiac index was associated with decreases in indicators of preload (end-diastolic volume and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure), whereas end-systolic volume and global ejection fraction did not change statistically. In the methohexital group, the decrease in cardiac index was associated with a decrease in global ejection fraction and an increase in end-systolic volume, whereas indicators of preload remained unchanged. It is concluded that methohexital reduces left ventricular performance. In contrast, propofol preserves left ventricular performance despite a likely negative inotropic effect.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lepage et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9034506e7e048e0989d11dhttps://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199107000-00002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper