PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 7, 2003European Journal of Echocardiography31 citationsOpen Access

Enhanced visualisation of the right ventricle by contrast echocardiography in congenital heart disease

View Full Paper
AVA VandenboschFMFolkert J. MeijboomJMJacky McGhie

Structured PICO

Does contrast echocardiography improve right ventricle endocardial border visualisation in adult patients with congenital heart disease compared to imaging without contrast?

P
Population
20 adult patients with congenital heart disease
I
Intervention
Contrast (Sonovue) echocardiography
C
Comparator
Second harmonic two-dimensional echocardiography without contrast
O
Outcome
Right ventricle (RV) endocardial border visualisation (EBV) graded from 0 to 3 for 13 RV wall segmentssurrogate

Contrast echocardiography significantly improves right ventricular endocardial border visualization in adult patients with congenital heart disease, potentially altering the visual estimation of RV function.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast echocardiography improves endocardial border detection of the left ventricle. Whether this is also true for the right ventricle (RV) is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess whether the use of contrast (Sonovue) echocardiography has additional value in RV endocardial border visualisation (EBV), and whether it has impact on the echocardiographic judgement of RV function. METHODS: Twenty adult patients with congenital heart disease were imaged using second harmonic two-dimensional echocardiography with and without contrast. Two independent observers analysed EBV of 13 RV wall segments in each patient. EBV was graded for each wall segment from 0 to 3 ( 0 = not visible, 3 = optimal visible). RESULTS: EBV improved in all patients with contrast echocardiography compared to second harmonic imaging (mean EBV 1.00 +/- 0.77 with second harmonics, 2.13 +/- 0.75 with contrast, P < 0.0001). The benefit was most evident in the near-field images. In 55% of the patients visual estimation of RV function changed with contrast echocardiography. CONCLUSION: The use of contrast echocardiography is superior to second harmonic imaging for RV EBV. Improved EBV may allow more accurate assessment of RV dimensions and function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vandenbosch et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9121ef8b76b10fb073e1b9https://doi.org/10.1016/s1525-2167(03)00048-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper