PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2005Anesthesiology5 citations

Validity of Unplanned Admission to an Intensive Care Unit as a Measure of Patient Safety in Surgical Patients

View Full Paper
GHGuy HallerPMPaul S. MylesRWRory Wolfe

Structured PICO

Is unplanned admission to the intensive care unit within 24 h of a procedure a valid measure of patient safety in surgical patients?

P
Population
44,130 surgical patients admitted to the authors' hospital
I
Intervention
Unplanned admission to the intensive care unit within 24 h of a procedure (UIA)
C
Comparator
Patients without an unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (non-UIA patients)
O
Outcome
Association of UIA with intraoperative incidents and near misses, increased hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortalitysafety

Unplanned admission to the ICU within 24 hours of a surgical procedure is strongly associated with intraoperative incidents, increased length of stay, and higher 30-day mortality, validating its use as a measure of patient safety.

Abstract

Background. An unplanned admission to the intensive care unit within 24 h of a procedure (UIA) is a recommended clinical indicator in surgical patients. Often regarded as a surrogate marker of adverse events, it has potential as a direct measure of patient safety. Its true validity for such use is currently unknown.Methods. The authors validated UIA as an indicator of safety in surgical patients in a prospective cohort study of 44,130 patients admitted to their hospital. They assessed the association of UIA with intraoperative incidents and near misses, increased hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality as three constructs of patient safety.Results. The authors identified 201 patients with a UIA; 104 (52.2%) had at least one incident or near miss. After adjusting for confounders, these incidents were significantly associated with UIA in all categories of surgical procedures analyzed; odds ratios were 12.21 (95% confidence interval CI, 6.33-23.58), 4.06 (95% CI, 2.74-6.03), and 2.13 (95% CI, 1.02-4.42), respectively. The 30-day mortality for patients with UIA was 10.9%, compared with 1.1% in non-UIA patients. After risk adjustment, UIA was associated with excess mortality in several types of surgical procedures (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.14-7.04). The median length of stay was increased if UIA occurred: 16 days (interquartile range, 10-31) versus 2 days (interquartile range, 0.5-9) (P < 0.001). For patients with a UIA, the likelihood of discharge from hospital was significantly decreased in most surgical categories analyzed, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.23-0.77) to 0.58 (95% CI, 0.37-0.93).Conclusions. These findings provide strong support for the construct validity of UIA as a measure of patient safety.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haller et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a91af7d5b38e717e65bb7f4https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200512010-00004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper