PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2008Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine13 citations

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part II: The use of ROC curves in the choice of electrocardiographic stress test markers of ischaemia

View Full Paper
SMStefania MarazìaLBLuca BarnabeiRCRaffaele De Caterina

Structured PICO

How can ROC curves be used to select optimal parameters on exercise electrocardiographic stress testing for diagnosing coronary artery disease?

I
Intervention
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the choice of electrocardiographic stress test markers of ischaemia
O
Outcome
Diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) for underlying coronary artery disease

This review provides a methodological overview of using ROC curves to optimize diagnostic criteria in exercise electrocardiographic stress testing.

Abstract

A common problem in diagnostic medicine, when performing a diagnostic test, is to obtain an accurate discrimination between 'normal' cases and cases with disease, owing to the overlapping distributions of these populations. In clinical practice, it is exceedingly rare that a chosen cut point will achieve perfect discrimination between normal cases and those with disease, and one has to select the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity by comparing the diagnostic performance of different tests or diagnostic criteria available. Receiver operating characteristic (or receiver operator characteristic, ROC) curves allow systematic and intuitively appealing descriptions of the diagnostic performance of a test and a comparison of the performance of different tests or diagnostic criteria. This review will analyse the basic principles underlying ROC curves and their specific application to the choice of optimal parameters on exercise electrocardiographic stress testing. Part II will be devoted to the comparative analysis of various parameters derived from exercise stress testing for the diagnosis of underlying coronary artery disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marazìa et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9258b57fe4291aaf384e2ehttps://doi.org/10.2459/jcm.0b013e32813ef418
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part I: The use of ROC curves in diagnostic medicine and electrocardiographic markers of ischaemia2007 · 14 citations
  2. 2Subject‐centered free‐response ROC (FROC) analysis2013 · 4 citations
  3. 3Effect of Observer Instruction on ROC Study of Chest Images1990 · 32 citations
  4. 4Relationship of Predictive Modeling to Receiver Operating Characteristics2008 · 25 citations
  5. 5Optimizing classification accuracy under non-normal measurement errors: a unified approach using Half-Normal and Exponential ROC curves2026