PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2009Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume322 citations

Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing

View Full Paper
SGSion Glyn‐JonesHPHemant PanditYKYoung‐Min Kwon

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is commonly performed for osteoarthritis in young active patients. We have observed cystic or solid masses, which we have called inflammatory pseudotumours, arising around these devices. They may cause soft-tissue destruction with severe symptoms and a poor outcome after revision surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for pseudotumours that are serious enough to require revision surgery. Since 1999, 1419 metal-on-metal hip resurfacings have been implanted by our group in 1224 patients; 1.8% of the patients had a revision for pseudotumour. In this series the Kaplan-Meier cumulative revision rate for pseudotumour increased progressively with time. At eight years, in all patients, it was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 5.8). Factors significantly associated with an increase in revision rate were female gender (p < 0.001), age under 40 (p = 0.003), small components (p = 0.003), and dysplasia (p = 0.019), whereas implant type was not (p = 0.156). These factors were inter-related, however, and on fitting a Cox proportional hazard model only gender (p = 0.002) and age (p = 0.024) had a significant independent influence on revision rate; size nearly reached significance (p = 0.08). Subdividing the cohort according to significant factors, we found that the revision rate for pseudotumours in men was 0.5% (95% CI 0 to 1.1) at eight years whereas in women over 40 years old it was 6% (95% CI 2.3 to 10.1) at eight years and in women under 40 years it was 13.1% at six years (95% CI 0 to 27) (p < 0.001). We recommend that resurfacings are undertaken with caution in women, particularly those under 40 years of age but they remain a good option in young men. Further work is required to understand the aetiology of pseudotumours so that this complication can be avoided.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Glyn‐Jones et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a92f28405f8fb3d88925d22https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b12.22287
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Results of Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Hip Resurfacing for Crowe Type-I and II Developmental Dysplasia2007 · 59 citations
  2. 2Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing2005 · 446 citations
  3. 3Elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip-resurfacing prostheses2003 · 79 citations
  4. 4The Influence of Gender and Age on Hamstring Muscle Length in Healthy Adults2005 · 142 citations
  5. 5Metal-on-Metal Bearings and Hypersensitivity in Patients with Artificial Hip Joints2005 · 1,129 citations