PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2016Journal of the American Geriatrics Society133 citations

Comparison of Frailty Measures as Predictors of Outcomes After Orthopedic Surgery

ZCZara CooperSRSelwyn O. RogersLNLong Ngo

Key Result

Preoperative frailty, assessed by the Frailty Phenotype, predicted a greater risk of postoperative complications compared to being robust (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.1).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=415)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Do the Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index predict postoperative outcomes in older adults undergoing major elective orthopedic surgery?

P
Population
415 individuals aged 70 and older undergoing scheduled orthopedic surgery at two tertiary hospitals.
E
Exposure
Preoperative assessment of frailty using the Frailty Phenotype (FP) and Frailty Index (FI)
C
Comparator
Robust (non-frail) status
O
Outcome
Postoperative complications, postoperative length of stay (LOS) of longer than 5 days, discharge to postacute institutional care (PAC), and 30-day readmissionhard clinical

Both the Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index are effective tools for preoperative risk stratification, predicting adverse postoperative outcomes in older adults undergoing major elective orthopedic surgery.

Main Result

Relative Risk: 1.7 (95% CI 1.1–2.1)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To apply the Frailty Phenotype (FP) and Frailty Index (FI) before major elective orthopedic surgery to categorize frailty status and assess associations with postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 70 and older undergoing scheduled orthopedic surgery enrolled in the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) Study (N = 415). MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative evaluation included assessment of frailty using the FP and FI. The weighted kappa statistic was used to determine concordance between the two frailty measures and multivariable modeling to determine associations between each measure and postoperative complications, postoperative length of stay (LOS) of longer than 5 days, discharge to postacute institutional care (PAC), and 300 day readmission. RESULTS: Frailty was highly prevalent (FP, 35%; FI, 41%). There was moderate concordance between the FP and FI (κ = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.49). When using the FP, being prefrail predicted greater risk of complications (relative risk (RR) = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1) and discharge to PAC (RR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2-2.9) than being robust, and being frail predicted more complications (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1), LOS longer than 5 days (RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.1-8.8), and discharge to PAC (RR = 2.3 95% CI = 1.4-3.7). When using FI, being prefrail predicted LOS longer than 5 days (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0-4.8) and discharge to PAC (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.4-2.1), as did being frail (RR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.5; RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.4-6.8, respectively). The other outcomes were not significantly associated with frailty status. CONCLUSION: FP and FI predict postoperative outcomes after major elective orthopedic surgery and should be considered for preoperative risk stratification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cooper et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in scheduled orthopedic surgery (n=415). Frailty vs. Robust status was evaluated on postoperative complications (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). Preoperative frailty, assessed by the Frailty Phenotype, predicted a greater risk of postoperative complications compared to being robust (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.1).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a95a012ab3d876b22f1a33dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14387
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper