PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2004Annals of Surgery70 citationsOpen Access

Endoleak Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

View Full Paper
MCMatthew A. CorriereIFIrene D. FeurerSBStacey Y. Becker

Key Result

Endoleak developed in 24% of patients following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, with risk decreasing as negative scans increased (P<0.001) and increasing with aneurysm expansion (P=0.04).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=220)

Structured PICO

What is the natural history and what are the risk factors for endoleak development following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?

P
Population
220 patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, followed for an average of 19 months to assess endoleak development.
E
Exposure
Postoperative surveillance following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR)
O
Outcome
New endoleak developmentsafety

Endoleaks can occur up to 7 years following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, suggesting that long-term surveillance cannot be uniformly reduced.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR) requires long-term surveillance for endoleak or increase in aneurysm diameter. We analyzed the natural history of and risk factors for endoleak development. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Endoleak is a common complication of EAR that can lead to aneurysm enlargement and even rupture. Following EAR, imaging studies are used to identify leaks since patients with endoleak may require additional endovascular interventions or conversion to open repair. No criteria currently exist for cessation or reduction in frequency of screening imaging studies. METHODS: Data on 220 patients undergoing EAR were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used with the end point being new endoleak development. Potential risk factors included preoperative aneurysm diameter, number of negative surveillance studies, and postoperative increase in diameter. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (24%) who underwent EAR had endoleak detected during postoperative follow-up, which averaged 19 months (range, 0.4-101 months). One, 6-, 12-, and 24- month endoleak-free survival was 90%, 80%, 77%, and 73%, respectively. Three leaks occurred after year 2, at postoperative months 24, 48, and 85. Increasing number of negative screening studies was negatively associated with risk for endoleak development (B = -3.122, P < 0.001), while increase in aneurysm diameter was positively associated with risk for endoleak (B = 0.072, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Risk for endoleak declines as the number of negative postoperative scans increases, but new endoleaks are identified as late as 7 years following EAR. Reduction in screening frequency cannot be uniformly recommended at this time. Patients with documented aneurysm expansion should be monitored carefully and endoleak should be suspected.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Corriere et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=220). Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR) was evaluated on new endoleak development. Endoleak developed in 24% of patients following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, with risk decreasing as negative scans increased (P<0.001) and increasing with aneurysm expansion (P=0.04).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a962bbb283842945bd7abd5https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000128300.60156.ab
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper