PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1996Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology52 citations

Decreased Heart Rate Variability in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Chronotropic Incompetence

View Full Paper
FLFei LüPKPhilip J. KeelingNSNicolas Sadoul

Structured PICO

P
Population
41 patients (aged 48 +/- 12 years) with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
O
Outcome
Heart rate variability (total, low, and high frequency components, and SDNN) analyzed from 24-hour Holter ECGssurrogate

Patients with congestive heart failure and chronotropic incompetence have significantly decreased heart rate variability, suggesting an abnormal autonomic influence on the heart.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Heart rate variability was studied in 41 patients (aged 48 +/- 12 years) with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. All patients underwent a treadmill exercise test and 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring. Chronotropic incompetence was defined as the failure to achieve > or = 80% of the predicted maximal heart rate response given by 220--age (years) at peak exercise. Spectral heart rate variability was analyzed from 24-hour Holter ECGs and was expressed as total (0.01-1.00 Hz), low (0.04-0.15 Hz), and high (0.15-0.40 Hz) frequency components. The standard deviation of all normal RR intervals (SDNN) was also computed. Chronotropic incompetence was observed in ten patients. Peak oxygen consumption was significantly lower in patients with chronotropic incompetence compared with those without chronotropic incompetence. The total (5.11 +/- 1.26 ln ms2 vs 6.41 +/- 0.92 ln ms2; P = 0.009) and low (3.38 +/- 1.65 ln ms2 vs 5.45 +/- 1.34 ln ms2; P = 0.003), but not the high (3.42 +/- 1.04 ln ms2 vs 4.00 +/- 1.12 ln ms2; P = 0.249) frequency components of heart rate variability were significantly lower in patients with chronotropic incompetence, although there was no significant difference in mean heart rate (88 +/- 20 beats/min vs 86 +/- 15 beats/min; P = 0.831) or left ventricular ejection fraction (22% +/- 10% vs 24% +/- 10%; P = 0.619). SDNN was also significantly lower in patients with chronotropic incompetence compared with those without chronotropic incompetence (64 +/- 34 ms vs 102 +/- 37 ms; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The observation that heart rate variability is significantly decreased in patients with congestive heart failure who have chronotropic incompetence suggests that chronotropic incompetence may relate to an abnormal autonomic influence on the heart in these patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lü et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a968d5c31394ac286fbc3e1https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb06519.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper