PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 2, 2026BMC Medical Imaging0 citationsOpen Access

MALCNet: modality-aware latent completion network for brain tumor segmentation with incomplete MRI modalities

MZMingzhe ZhangHCHuijian ChenYSYang Song

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Accurate brain tumor segmentation from multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relies on complementary information from T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR sequences. In clinical practice and retrospective studies, one or more MRI modalities are often missing due to heterogeneous acquisition protocols, patient-related constraints, or incomplete historical records. Such modality incompleteness introduces distribution shifts that substantially degrade the performance of segmentation models trained on complete multi-modal inputs. We propose MALCNet, a modality-aware latent completion network for robust brain tumor segmentation under arbitrary missing MRI modalities. MALCNet completes missing information in the latent space through three key components: a shared-weight encoder with an adaptive modality-specific correction unit to extract anatomy-consistent yet modality-sensitive hierarchical features; a modality-aware imputation transformer that performs bottleneck-level completion, initializing missing modalities with learnable semantic priors and refining them via cross-modal attention; and an attention-guided multi-scale propagation module that transfers completed high-level semantics to shallow feature maps to recover fine-grained spatial details. During training, a dual-branch consistency optimization strategy aligns predictions and features between complete- and incomplete-modality inputs. MALCNet is evaluated separately on two BraTS releases (BraTS2019 and BraTS2020) under all 15 non-empty modality configurations. It achieves average Dice similarity coefficients of 86.68%, 76.73%, and 63.60% for whole tumor, tumor core, and enhancing tumor, respectively, on BraTS2019; the corresponding values on BraTS2020 are 87.86%, 79.59%, and 64.10%. Subject-level paired comparisons against six incomplete-modality methods show statistically significant differences for all tumor regions on both releases (all P -values ≤ 0.002). MALCNet provides a robust approach for brain tumor segmentation with incomplete MRI modalities. By combining modality-aware latent completion with multi-scale feature propagation and dual-branch consistency optimization, the model effectively preserves both anatomical coherence and modality-specific tumor cues, achieving reliable segmentation across diverse missing-modality configurations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a97e2f6c562ede874ec77a0https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02726-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1CMAF-Net: a cross-modal attention fusion-based deep neural network for incomplete multi-modal brain tumor segmentation2024 · 29 citations
  2. 2Modality-adaptive Network Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation with Incomplete Multi-modal MRI Data2024
  3. 3MedMAP: Promoting Incomplete Multi-modal Brain Tumor Segmentation with Alignment2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4PF-CMNet: Progressive Frequency-Aware Cross-Modal Network with Missing-Modality Distillation for 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation2026
  5. 5MedMAP: Promoting Incomplete Multi-modal Brain Tumor Segmentation with Alignment2024