PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 7, 2010Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging12 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of QT peak and QT end interval responses to autonomic adaptation in asymptomatic LQT1 mutation carriers

View Full Paper
PHPetri HaapalahtiMVMatti ViitasaloMPMerja Perhonen

Key Result

Asymptomatic LQT1 mutation carriers exhibited QT peak shortening during abrupt sympathetic activation unlike controls, increasing transmural dispersion of repolarization.

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=17)

Structured PICO

Do QT peak and QT end interval responses to autonomic adaptation differ between asymptomatic LQT1 mutation carriers and healthy controls?

P
Population
17 subjects, comprising 9 asymptomatic KCNQ1 mutation carriers and 8 healthy controls, studied during autonomic adaptation maneuvers.
E
Exposure
Autonomic adaptation maneuvers (Valsalva manoeuvre, mental stress, handgrip and supine exercise)
C
Comparator
Unaffected healthy controls
O
Outcome
Global QT peak and QT end intervals derived from 25 simultaneous electrocardiographic leads measured beat to beatsurrogate

In asymptomatic LQT1 carriers, repolarization abnormalities are more evident in the QT peak than in the QT end interval during adrenergic adaptation, suggesting increased transmural dispersion of repolarization.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: LQT1 subtype of long QT syndrome is characterized by defective I(Ks) , which is intrinsically stronger in the epicardium than in the midmyocardial region. Electrocardiographic QT peak and QT end intervals may reflect complete repolarization of epicardium and midmyocardial region of the ventricular wall, respectively. Repolarization abnormalities in LQT1 carriers may therefore be more easily detected in the QT peak intervals. METHODS: Asymptomatic KCNQ1 mutation carriers (LQT1, n=9) and unaffected healthy controls (n=8) were studied during Valsalva manoeuvre, mental stress, handgrip and supine exercise. Global QT peak and QT end intervals derived from 25 simultaneous electrocardiographic leads were measured beat to beat with an automated method. RESULTS: In unaffected subjects, the percentage shortening of QT peak was greater than that of QT end during mental stress and during the recovery phases of Valsalva and supine exercise. In LQT1 carriers, the percentage shortening of the intervals was similar. At the beginning of Valsalva strain under abrupt endogenous sympathetic activation, QT peak shortened in LQT1 but not in control patients yielding increased electrocardiographic transmural dispersion of repolarization in LQT1. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic KCNQ1 mutation carriers, repolarization abnormalities are more evident in the QT peak than in the QT end interval during adrenergic adaptation, possibly related to transmural differences in the degree of I(Ks) block.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haapalahti et al. (2010) conducted a case-control in Asymptomatic LQT1 mutation (n=17). KCNQ1 mutation (LQT1) vs. Unaffected healthy controls was evaluated on QT peak and QT end interval responses to autonomic adaptation. Asymptomatic LQT1 mutation carriers exhibited QT peak shortening during abrupt sympathetic activation unlike controls, increasing transmural dispersion of repolarization.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a98e5a61c4dac29babd4580https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097x.2010.01002.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper