PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 5, 2021Acta Biochimica Polonica3 citationsOpen Access

Kidney graft function and arterial stiffness in renal transplant recipients

ZHZbigniew HeleniakSISarah IllerspergerADAlicja Dębska‐Ślizień

Key Result

In stable renal transplant recipients, arterial stiffness was significantly associated with age and cardiovascular disease, but did not differ depending on estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=344)

Structured PICO

Does eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 increase arterial stiffness in stable renal transplant recipients?

P
Population
344 stable renal transplant recipients evaluated for arterial stiffness based on estimated glomerular filtration rate.
E
Exposure
eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2
C
Comparator
eGFR ≥45 ml/min/1.73 m2
O
Outcome
Arterial stiffness (measured by automated oscillometric device, including pulse wave velocity [PWV], pulse pressure [PP], and pulsatile stress [PS])surrogate

In renal transplant recipients, arterial stiffness is significantly influenced by age and cardiovascular disease, but does not independently differ based on eGFR.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In renal transplant recipients (RTRs), cardiovascular (CV) complications are associated with non-traditional risk factors, such as a decline in graft function, immunosuppressive therapy, time of dialysis before transplantation, inflammation and anemia. Higher value of arterial stiffness is the consequence of risk factors and it can lead to CV events. The aim of this study was the assessment of the arterial stiffness in RTRs with different value of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and its correlation with classical and non-classical CV risk factors. METHODS: 344 stable RTRs were enrolled in this study. The arterial stiffness was measured in all participants. The study population was divided in two groups based on the value of eGFR: 201 (≥45 ml/min/1,73 m2) and 143 (<45 ml/min/1,73 m2). Demographic, immunosuppression status, clinical and biochemical information were referred to a single assessment obtained from medical records in the patients' medical files. Vascular stiffness was determined by an automated oscillometric device. RESULTS: In the group with eGFR<45 ml/min/1.73 m2 there were more patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and the participants were older, in comparison to those with eGFR≥45 ml/min/1.73 m2. Arterial stiffness was significantly higher in the group with worse graft function. The analysis showed a significant correlation between age, cardiovascular disease and all arterial stiffness parameters. In addition, a significant correlation was found between all PWV variables and pulse pressure (PP) and pulsatile stress (PS), in the total population and in groups with eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR≥45 ml/min/1.73 m2. The multivariate analysis showed a significant correlation between age, CVD and baPWV left, baPWV right and cf PWV in the total population. Arterial stiffness did not differ depending on eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Significant influence of age and CVD on arterial stiffness in RTRs was confirmed and PWV did not differ depending on eGFR. Our findings suggest that PS, as a marker for arterial stiffness, represents an easy and cost-effective tool.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heleniak et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Renal transplant recipients (n=344). eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. eGFR ≥45 ml/min/1.73 m2 was evaluated on Arterial stiffness. In stable renal transplant recipients, arterial stiffness was significantly associated with age and cardiovascular disease, but did not differ depending on estimated glomerular filtration rate.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a98e97b19c7e0464f272f09https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2020_5595
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper