PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1994Anesthesia & Analgesia14 citations

The Influence of Anesthesia on Myocardial Oxygen Utilization Efficiency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Surgery

View Full Paper
AHAndreas HoeftHSH. SonntagHSHeidrun Stephan

Key Result

Anesthesia induction decreased myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency from 29.2% at awake state to 23.9%, with no differences observed between specific anesthetic techniques.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=65)

Structured PICO

Does the specific type of anesthesia influence myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery?

P
Population
65 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery evaluated retrospectively across eight different anesthetic techniques.
E
Exposure
8 different anesthetic techniques (halothane/nitrous oxide, enflurane/nitrous oxide, high-dose morphine, high-dose fentanyl, fentanyl/midazolam, high-dose sufentanil, sufentanil/nitrous oxide, and propofol)
C
Comparator
Comparison among the 8 different anesthetic techniques
O
Outcome
Myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency (ratio of external work divided by myocardial oxygen consumption)surrogate

Induction of anesthesia impairs myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, regardless of the specific anesthetic technique used.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 23.9% vs 29.2%

Abstract

A maximum efficiency of myocardial oxygen utilization is desirable, especially in patients with limited coronary blood supply. Little is known about the effects of anesthesia on the efficiency of myocardial oxygen utilization. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effects of different types of anesthesia on myocardial efficiency in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Myocardial blood flow (Argon wash in technique), myocardial oxygen uptake, and standard hemodynamics were measured awake, after induction of anesthesia, and during sternal spread. Myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency was calculated from the ratio of external work divided by myocardial oxygen consumption. Sixty-five patients in eight groups with different anesthetic techniques were studied: 1) halothane/nitrous oxide, 2) enflurane/nitrous oxide, 3) high-dose morphine, 4) high-dose fentanyl, 5) fentanyl/midazolam, 6) high-dose sufentanil, 7) sufentanil/nitrous oxide, and 8) propofol. In all groups induction of anesthesia was associated with a decrease of cardiac work (from 86 +/- 17 to 55 +/- 16 J/min in pooled data) which resulted from a decrease of both stroke volume index and blood pressure. However, myocardial oxygen consumption did not decrease proportionally (from 11.2 +/- 3.0 to 8.5 +/- 2.3 mL.min-1 x 100 g-1 in pooled data) and myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency was therefore decreased in all groups (from 29.2% +/- 2.5% at awake state to 23.9% +/- 5.8% after induction of anesthesia in pooled data). Surgical stimulation by sternotomy and sternal spread was associated with different patterns of hemodynamic response between groups. Blood pressures and external work tended to be higher in the high-dose narcotic groups while it remained less affected in the other groups. However, myocardial efficiency remained depressed in all groups (22.2% +/- 8.2% in pooled data) and with respect to myocardial efficiency no differences between anesthetic techniques were found. We conclude that the specific anesthetic technique does not influence impairment of myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency by anesthesia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoeft et al. (1994) conducted an observational in Coronary bypass surgery (n=65). Anesthesia vs. Awake state was evaluated on Myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency. Anesthesia induction decreased myocardial oxygen utilization efficiency from 29.2% at awake state to 23.9%, with no differences observed between specific anesthetic techniques.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9ab76e8aa0132f4d90abc5https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199405000-00006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Myocardial Metabolism and Hemodynamic Responses to Halothane or Morphine Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Surgery1982 · 30 citations
  2. 2Myocardial Metabolism and Hemodynamic Responses to Halothane or Morphine Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Surgery1983 · 34 citations
  3. 3Comparison of Fentanyl and Halothane as Supplement to Nitrous‐Oxide‐Oxygen Anaesthesia for Coronary Artery Surgery1985 · 1 citations
  4. 4Changes in blood oxygen transport function and body energy expenditure during anaesthesia during coronary artery bypass grafting in adults: A randomized clinical study2023
  5. 5Indices of Myocardial Oxygenation during Coronary-artery Revascularization in Man with Morphine Versus Halothane Anesthesia1979 · 38 citations