PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 13, 2014Journal of Nuclear Medicine227 citationsOpen Access

Respective Performance of 18 F-FDG PET and Radiolabeled Leukocyte Scintigraphy for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis

FRFrançois RouzetRCRenata ChequerKBKhadija Benali

Key Result

For diagnosing prosthetic valve endocarditis, 18F-FDG PET showed higher sensitivity (93% vs 64%) but lower specificity (71% vs 100%) compared to radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=39)

Blinding

Masked

Structured PICO

How does the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET compare to radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy in patients with suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis and inconclusive echocardiography?

P
Population
39 consecutive patients with clinically suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis and inconclusive echocardiography results, followed for 3 months.
E
Exposure
18F-FDG PET
C
Comparator
Radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy
O
Outcome
Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy) for infective endocarditis based on final Duke-Li classification at 3-month follow-upsurrogate

18F-FDG PET offers high sensitivity for detecting active infection in suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis, while leukocyte scintigraphy provides higher specificity and is particularly useful when PET is inconclusive or within 2 months after cardiac surgery.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 86%

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Echocardiography plays a key role in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) but can be inconclusive in patients in whom prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is suspected. The incremental diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET and radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy in IE patients has already been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the respective performance of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy for the diagnosis of PVE in 39 patients. METHODS: (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy were performed on 39 consecutive patients admitted because of clinically suspected PVE and inconclusive echocardiography results. The results of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy were analyzed separately and retrospectively by experienced physicians masked to the results of the other imaging technique and to patient outcome. The final Duke-Li IE classification was made after a 3-mo follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients, 14 were classified as having definite IE, 4 as having possible IE, and 21 as not having IE. The average interval between (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy was 7 ± 7 d. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 93%, 71%, 68%, 94%, and 80%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG PET and 64%, 100%, 100%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, for leukocyte scintigraphy. Discrepancies between the results of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy occurred in 12 patients (31%). In patients with definite IE, 5 had true-positive (18)F-FDG PET results but false-negative leukocyte scintigraphy results. Of these 5 patients, 3 had nonpyogenic microorganism IE (Coxiella or Candida). Of patients for whom endocarditis had been excluded, 6 had true-negative leukocyte scintigraphy results but false-positive (18)F-FDG PET results. These 6 patients had been imaged in the first 2 mo after the last cardiac surgery. The last patient with a discrepancy between (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy was classified as having possible endocarditis and had positive (18)F-FDG PET results and negative leukocyte scintigraphy results. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET offers high sensitivity for the detection of active infection in patients with suspected PVE and inconclusive echocardiography results. Leukocyte scintigraphy offers a higher specificity, however, than (18)F-FDG PET for diagnosis of IE and should be considered in cases of inconclusive (18)F-FDG PET findings or in the first 2 mo after cardiac surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rouzet et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis (n=39). 18F-FDG PET vs. Radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for prosthetic valve endocarditis. For diagnosing prosthetic valve endocarditis, 18F-FDG PET showed higher sensitivity (93% vs 64%) but lower specificity (71% vs 100%) compared to radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9b9c2a5d361a92c1bb03c3https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.141895
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Proposed Modifications to the Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis2000 · 4,052 citations
  2. 2Role of radiolabelled leucocyte scintigraphy in patients with a suspicion of prosthetic valve endocarditis and inconclusive echocardiography2013 · 103 citations
  3. 3Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease2007 · 3,597 citations
  4. 4Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis2013 · 500 citations
  5. 5Cardiac Valves in Patients with Q Fever Endocarditis: Microbiological, Molecular, and Histologic Studies2003 · 142 citations