PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2003Perceptual and Motor Skills78 citations

Screening for Depression in Clinical Practice: Reliability and Validity of a Five-Item Subset of the CES-Depression

View Full Paper
RBRichard W. BohannonRMRose MaljanianJGJohn W. Goethe

Key Result

A 5-item subset of the CES-Depression scale showed acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha 0.76) and high correlation (0.91) with the full 20-item scale for identifying depression.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional

Structured PICO

Does a 5-item subset of the CES-D scale provide reliable and valid screening for depression compared to the full 20-item scale in outpatients with chronic disease?

P
Population
Inner-city outpatients with chronic asthma or diabetes, mostly female (73.1%) and Hispanic (61.8%).
E
Exposure
5-item subset of the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
C
Comparator
Full 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
O
Outcome
Reliability (Cronbach alpha) and validity (correlation with full 20 items, sensitivity, specificity)patient reported

A 5-item subset of the CES-D scale is a reliable and valid tool for depression screening in chronic disease outpatients, potentially reducing patient and clinician burden.

Main Result

Effect estimate: correlation of 0.91

Abstract

Individuals with chronic disease are not screened routinely for depression. Availability of an abbreviated test with demonstrated reliability and validity might encourage screening so we explored the reliability and validity of a 5-item subset of the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among inner-city outpatients with chronic asthma or diabetes. Most patients were female (73.1%) and Hispanic (61.8%). Acceptable reliability was shown by Cronbach alpha (.76) for the subset of 5 items. Validity was supported by the high correlation of .91 between patients' scores on the 5-item subset and the full 20 items. The 5 items reflected a single factor (eigenvalue = 2.66). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified cut-points for the 5 items that were sensitive (> .84) and specific (> or = .80) in identifying patients classified as depressed by full 20 items. The reduced patient and clinician burden of the subset of 5 items, as well as its desirable psychometric properties, support broader application of this subset as a screening tool for depression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bohannon et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic asthma or diabetes. 5-item subset of the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale vs. Full 20-item CES-Depression Scale was evaluated on Reliability (Cronbach alpha) and validity (correlation with full 20 items) (correlation of 0.91). A 5-item subset of the CES-Depression scale showed acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha 0.76) and high correlation (0.91) with the full 20-item scale for identifying depression.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9cd3877d79dcff4182ce52https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.3.855
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper