PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1992Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume107 citations

Classification of fractures of the tibial condyles

View Full Paper
SHSE HonkonenMJMJ Järvinen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We analysed 131 fractures of the tibial condyles in 130 patients, using a modification of the classification of Schatzker, McBroom and Bruce (1979). The patients were reviewed at an average of 7.6 years after the injury. Fifty-five (42%) fractures had been treated conservatively and 76 (58%) operatively. Medial unicondylar and medially tilted bicondylar fractures tended to redisplace into varus position and lateral unicondylar and laterally tilted bicondylar fractures into valgus. There were significant differences when the results were evaluated according to the methods of Hohl and Luck (1956) and Rasmussen (1973). Using our method in conservatively treated cases, the subjective results were acceptable in 49.1%, the functional results in 60.0% and the clinical results in 52.7%. In cases treated by operation the equivalent figures were 57.9%, 73.7% and 52.6%. The poorest results followed displaced medial condylar and medially tilted bicondylar fractures. Varus alignment of the tibial plateau was tolerated worse than valgus alignment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Honkonen et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9e206d6e3e9028e6be5d4chttps://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.74b6.1447244
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper