PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1996Journal of the American College of Cardiology478 citationsOpen Access

Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: Assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by doppler tissue imaging

View Full Paper
MGMario J. GarciaLRLeonardo RodríguezMAMiguel Ares

Key Result

Peak early velocity of longitudinal axis expansion (Ea) was significantly higher in patients with constrictive pericarditis (14.8 cm/s) than in those with restrictive cardiomyopathy (5.1 cm/s, P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=30)

Structured PICO

Does measurement of left ventricular longitudinal axis expansion velocity (Ea) by Doppler tissue imaging differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy?

P
Population
30 participants comprising 8 patients with constrictive pericarditis, 7 with restrictive cardiomyopathy, and 15 normal volunteers.
E
Exposure
Measurement of peak early velocity of longitudinal axis expansion (Ea) using Doppler tissue imaging.
C
Comparator
Comparison between patients with constrictive pericarditis, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and normal volunteers.
O
Outcome
Peak early velocity of longitudinal axis expansion (Ea)surrogate

Doppler tissue imaging of longitudinal axis expansion velocity (Ea) provides a clinically useful and preload-independent method to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 14.8% vs 5.1%

p-value: p=< 0.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the utility of left ventricular expansion velocities in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that left ventricular diastolic expansion is influenced by the elastic recoil forces of the myocardium. These forces are affected by intrinsic myocardial disease but should be preserved when diastole is impaired as a result of extrinsic causes. METHODS: Using Doppler tissue imaging, we measured peak early velocity of longitudinal axis expansion (Ea) in 8 patients with constrictive pericarditis, 7 patients with restriction and 15 normal volunteers. Transmitral early (E) and late (A) Doppler flow velocities, left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes, ejection fraction and mitral annular M-mode displacement were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: The Ea value was significantly higher in normal subjects (14.5 +/- 4.7 cm/s mean +/- SD) and in patients with constriction (14.8 +/- 4.8 cm/s) than in those with restriction (5.1 +/- 1.4 cm/s, p < 0.001 constriction vs. restriction). There was weak correlation between Ea and the extent of annular displacement (r = 0.55, p = 0.004) and the E/A ratio (r = 0.44, p = 0.03). There was no correlation between Ea and E (r = 0.33, p = 0.07) or ejection fraction (r = 0.21, p = 0.26). By multivariate analysis, Ea was the best variable for differentiating constriction from restriction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that longitudinal axis expansion velocities are markedly reduced in patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy. The poor correlation found with transvalvular flow velocities suggests that Ea may be relatively preload independent. The measurement of longitudinal axis expansion velocities provides a clinically useful distinction between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy and may prove to be valuable in the study of diastolic function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Garcia et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy (n=30). Constrictive pericarditis vs. Restrictive cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Peak early velocity of longitudinal axis expansion (Ea) (p=< 0.001). Peak early velocity of longitudinal axis expansion (Ea) was significantly higher in patients with constrictive pericarditis (14.8 cm/s) than in those with restrictive cardiomyopathy (5.1 cm/s, P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa20b0e57affa4c5d46edd9https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(95)00434-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preload dependence of doppler-derived indexes of left ventricular diastolic function in humans1987 · 628 citations
  2. 2Echocardiographic features of the interventricular septum in chronic constrictive pericarditis.1978 · 100 citations
  3. 3Haemodynamic significance of the atrioventricular plane displacement in patients with coronary artery disease1992 · 130 citations
  4. 4Restrictive cardiomyopathy versus constrictive pericarditis: role of endomyocardial biopsy in avoiding unnecessary thoracotomy.1987 · 46 citations
  5. 5Transesophageal Doppler echocardiographic demonstration of pulmonary venous flow velocity in restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis1989 · 62 citations